To have any chance of defeating the elite coup and fighting effectively to avert our own extinction, we must fight strategically.
by Robert J. Burrowes
There is no COVID-19 virus. It does not exist. If you
ask any doctor or scientist in the world to show you a scientifically-verified
proof that it does exist, they will not be able to show you one.
Given that it has not been scientifically established
that the COVID-19 virus exists, it is therefore clear that everything being
done supposedly in the effort to tackle the ‘virus’ is being done for another purpose
and COVID-19 is being used to conceal this fact.
However, with the elite-driven narrative being
endlessly promoted by the World Health Organisation, governments, the medical
and pharmaceutical industries, along with the corporate media, the truth is
being obliterated.
And the reason for this is obvious: Any serious
consideration of the underlying evidence, as I have documented previously,
clearly indicates that the global elite is conducting a coup against humanity
and using the fear it generates around COVID-19 to distract people from paying
attention to what is happening in the background. For this reason, the coup
continues to gain pace with only an insignificant number of people yet aware of
the coup and its ongoing and increasingly devastating impacts.
‘How is the elite doing this?’ you might ask. Far too
easily, unfortunately.
In essence, key individuals in the World Health
Organisation (WHO), governments, the medical and pharmaceutical industries, as
well as the corporate media are lying to you about this. They are lying to you,
consciously or unconsciously, for essentially one of three reasons (essentially
determined by where the individual fits in relation to the elite’s ongoing
execution of its coup):
1. they are lying as an outcome of their complicity in
the coup (given the perceived benefits to them personally, at least in the
short term),
2. they are lying as an outcome of their ignorance (by
not investigating and considering the evidence for themself and submissively
accepting the elite narrative), or
3. they are lying as an outcome of their fear (of the
adverse personal repercussions they would expect for resisting the elite
narrative that there is indeed a virus).
And, so far, the elite is successfully executing its
coup because the many voices contradicting its narrative – such as those
individual doctors powerful enough to present the truth about the so-called
‘virus’ – are being denied a forum in any elite-controlled outlet such as the
corporate media or they are being censored (including removed from accessible
sites on the internet).
If what I have written above sounds incredible given
the worldwide response supposedly to tackle the ‘virus’, the evidence presented
below, together with the references to further documentation, will give you
plenty to consider (provided your own fear will allow you to do so).
But before presenting this evidence, it is worth being
aware of some of the existing adverse impacts of the coup:
1. The sudden destruction of the global economy has
impoverished tens of millions of people in industrialized societies through
unemployment, making them even more vulnerable to homelessness and other
misery, as well as precipitating the death of millions of people projected to
die of starvation in Africa, Asia and elsewhere because of the disruption of
global food production and supply. See ‘WFP chief warns of “hunger
pandemic” as Global Food Crises Report launched’ and ‘COVID-19 could kill more
people through hunger than the disease itself, warns Oxfam’.
2. There has been a dramatic increase in violence
against children and women all over the world and particularly in some contexts
with a recent United Nations Population Fund report highlighting that an
‘additional 5.6 million child marriages can be expected because of the
coronavirus pandemic, which resulted in a short-term increase in poverty and
the shutdown of schools’. In addition, the ‘current pandemic is also expected
to have a massive impact on the projected growth of harmful practices on
women’s bodies’ including female genital mutilation (FGM). See ‘Child Marriage, FGM and
Harmful Practices on Women’s Bodies to Increase Because of COVID-19’.
3. The lockdowns have imprisoned people in their homes
(with its seriously adverse psychological, social and physical repercussions)
and laws have been introduced regarding ‘social distancing’ and other measures
(including mask-wearing which I will discuss below) that have eviscerated
rights and freedoms it took centuries to win. For the details, see ‘The Elite’s COVID-19
Coup against a Terrified Humanity: Resisting Powerfully’.
In response to growing concerns on a number of points,
600 doctors signed a letter to US President Donald Trump to end the ‘lockdown’
– see ‘“Mass casualty incident”:
600 doctors sign letter to Trump calling for end to lockdowns over health
concerns’ – which has since
been signed by thousands. See ‘Literally Thousands of
Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci’s Lockdowns Including a
Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist. The Media Just Doesn’t Want You to Know’.
4. Despite the ‘diagnostic’ tests for COVID-19 being
‘scientifically meaningless’ – see ‘COVID19 PCR Tests are
Scientifically Meaningless’ –
(how can they not be when there is no virus?) compulsory vaccination (again,
against a non-existent virus) is being threatened – see ‘120 Covid-19 Vaccine
Projects are Underway’ – in
direct violation of Article 6 of the ‘Universal Declaration on
Bioethics and Human Rights’
despite the extensively documented record of vaccines causing devastating harms
including massive lethality. For a taste of the vast literature on this point,
see ‘Gates’ Globalist Vaccine
Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination’.
As Dr Stefan Lanka has explained about vaccines
generally:
Only ignorant people who blindly trust in the state
authorities who are ‘testing’ and approving the vaccines can regard vaccination
as a ‘small harmless prick’. The verifiable facts demonstrate the danger and
negligence of these scientists and politicians, who claim that vaccines are
safe, have little or no side-effects and would protect from a disease. None of
these claims is true and scientific.
See ‘The Misconception Called
“Virus”: Measles as an example’.
Moreover, this vaccination will be used to
dramatically expand surveillance both via biometric ID and ‘immunity passes’.
See ‘ID2020 and partners launch
program to provide digital ID with vaccines’ and ‘Mass-Tracking COVI-PASS
Immunity Passports Slated to Roll Out in 15 Countries’.
5. Other measures to expand surveillance (apart from
through vaccination) are being introduced. These include ‘contact tracing’
despite the fact that even ‘A WHO study on influenza pandemics in 2019 came to
the conclusion that contact tracing is not useful from an epidemiological point
of view and “is not recommended in any circumstances”.’ See ‘Facts about COVID-19’. But that is precisely the point: Contact tracing is
not about epidemiological usefulness; it is about surveillance.
6. Critically, several measures necessary to implement
the so-called fourth industrial revolution, including the deployment of 5G,
which will reduce human individuals to digitized identities without effective
rights and freedoms, are being accelerated. See ‘Techno-Tyranny: How The US
National Security State Is Using Coronavirus To Fulfill An Orwellian Vision’.
7. While much human activity has been brought to a
standstill, this has not included any of the violence which has not only
continued unchecked but has expanded. Apart from the dramatic increase in
violence against children and women all over the world noted above, wars,
threats of war, sanctions, the military violence of occupations in places such
as Palestine, Tibet and West Papua, the structural violence that systematically
exploits (that is, loots) countries in Africa, Asia and Central/South America,
the ecological violence that destroys lands, oceans and atmosphere have all
proceeded as usual with the caveat that there has been a reduction in the
emissions of some industrial and other waste products although this is hugely
problematic in one critical sense. See ‘Will COVID-19 Trigger
Extinction of All Life on Earth?’
8. And four distinct paths to human extinction –
nuclear war, the climate catastrophe, the deployment of 5G and biodiversity
collapse – have been accelerated, inadvertently or otherwise, by the coup. See ‘The Elite’s COVID-19 Coup to
Destroy Humanity that is also Fast-Tracking Four Paths to Human Extinction’.
COVID-19 Does Not Exist
Despite these and many other adverse impacts already happening
in response to the COVID-19 crisis, as noted at the beginning, it has never
been scientifically established that the COVID-19 virus actually exists. More
fundamentally, according to Dr Stefan Lanka: ‘Contrary to what most people
believe, there are no pathogenic viruses.… All claims about viruses as
pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognisable, understandable and
verifiable misinterpretations…. A real and complete virus does not exist
anywhere in the entire “scientific” literature.’ See ‘The Misconception Called
“Virus”: Measles as an example’.
To reiterate in the words of two other authors: ‘there
is no original scientific evidence that definitively demonstrates that any
virus is the cause of any disease’. See What Really Makes You Ill? Why everything you thought
you knew about disease is wrong. But you can read more in ‘Dismantling the Virus Theory
– The “measles virus” as an example’ and watch the video interview ‘The Real Science of Germs:
Do Viruses Cause Disease?’
In addition, and specifically in relation to COVID-19,
according to Dr Andrew Kaufman, ‘there is no evidence of anyone dying from any
novel illness’. See ‘Unmasking the Lies Around
COVID-19: Facts vs Fiction of the Coronavirus Pandemic’. So what has happened?
As Dr Kaufman explains: Early scientific papers on the
subject suggested an association (not causation) between a novel
coronavirus ‘with human to human transmission and severe human infection’
whereas a subsequent key ‘scientific’ paper that made a claim which helped
drive the global response to COVID-19 ‘flat out lied’ about their results:
‘Following the first outbreaks of unexplained pneumonia in Wuhan, China, in
late 2019, a new coronavirus was identified as the causative agent in January
2020.’ See ‘Identification of
Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19’. In fact, Dr Kaufman points out: ‘they cannot
reference any science to back that up whatsoever’.
Moreover, subsequently to this paper, another article
– see ‘I study viruses: How our
team isolated the new coronavirus to fight the global pandemic’ – declared ‘The emergence of a new coronavirus in a
market in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 set in motion the pandemic we are now
witnessing in 160 countries around the world’. But again, Dr Kaufman counters,
‘no evidence was provided at all’ to support this claim: ‘just flat out lies’.
For the details and citation of all the scientific sources for this
explanation of how the COVID-19 ‘rumour mill’ got started, see ‘The Rooster in the River of
Rats’ or ‘Koch’s Postulates: Have They Been Proven for
Viruses?’
Finally on this point, pathologist Dr Stoian Alexov,
President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association, has stated that he and his
colleagues across Europe:
have not found any evidence of any deaths from the
novel coronavirus on that continent.
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization
(WHO) a ‘criminal medical organization’ for creating worldwide fear and chaos
without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic. See ‘“No one has died from
the coronavirus”: Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President
of the Bulgarian Pathology Association’.
Fortunately, as awareness of the fact that the
COVID-19 virus does not exist gradually spreads, more people are challenging
the official response to the engineered crisis on that basis. For example, one
group of doctors has written to the British Prime Minister Boris Johnson
challenging Public Health England to ‘show proof’ that a virus exists. See ‘Challenge to Public Health
England that they must show Proof that a Virus Exists which Causes COVID-19 or
Declare there is No Virus and end the Vax and Trax Programmes’.
But it is clear that the engineered crisis and the
measures supposedly being taken to combat the non-existent ‘virus’ are being
used to mask the truth, including the elite coup, and so actions aimed at elite
agents, such as governments, must inevitably fail.
Unscientific Responses to the Non-existent Virus
The unscientific nature of the supposed threat posed
by the ‘virus’ is, of course, matched by the unscientific response with
countries imposing lockdowns suffering far worse outcomes – measured
psychologically, socially, economically and otherwise – than countries, such as
Japan, South Korea, Belarus and Sweden which did not follow this course. In any
case, countries that did impose lockdowns could only use lies and statistical
manipulation to make it appear that COVID-19 has been the cause of death among
some of those who are recently deceased. For a taste of the extensive
documentation, see ‘Facts about COVID-19: July 2020 Update’ and ‘COVID 19 Is A Statistical
Nonsense’.
Given that the negative impacts of the lockdown are
extensively documented, there have been many attempts (of many different kinds)
occurring all over the world to end them already. See, for example, ‘“Mass casualty incident”:
600 doctors sign letter to Trump calling for end to lockdowns over health
concerns’, ‘Vaccine Group Sues Trudeau
Government for “Draconian and Unjustifiable” Response to COVID-19’ and ‘Popular Uprising against 2nd
Covid Lockdown. Belgrade Liberated! The Govt Backs Down’.
But another way in which this unscientific response to
the non-existent ‘virus’ is manifesting is immediately obvious if one examines
the scientific evidence in relation to the effectiveness of masks in preventing
cross infection. As it turns out, as explained in a long series of documented
scientific studies, as distinct from the inaccurate claims promulgated by elite
agents, the research demonstrates that masks are at best ineffective, and at
worst horribly counterproductive; that is, masks cannot achieve the purpose for
which they are, supposedly, intended but they can achieve some very unhealthy
outcomes. But who among the general population is seeking out and
considering this evidence (which the WHO, governments, the medical and
pharmaceutical industries, the education systems and the corporate media are
not going to present)?
For just a sample of the evidence about the
ineffectiveness and dangers of wearing a mask, see the following:
‘Nevertheless, the question of the effectiveness of
masks can be asked. In the case of influenza epidemics, the answer is already
clear from a scientific point of view: masks in everyday life have no or very
little effect. If used improperly, they can even increase the risk of
infection.’ See ‘Facts about COVID-19: July
2020 Update’.
In a recent study published in The New England
Journal of Medicine, the five co-authors stated ‘We know that wearing a
mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from
infection.’ See ‘Universal Masking in
Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era’.
In his recent article ‘Masks
Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy’ documenting the results of his research, physics
professor Dr Denis G. Rancourt concludes:
No RCT [randomized controlled trial] study with
verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW [health care workers] or community
members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study.
There are no exceptions.
Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a
broad policy to wear masks in public.
Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a
mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles,
then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a
surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that
there is no such relative benefit.
Masks and respirators do not work.
By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies
for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments
have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following
the precautionary principle.
After reviewing more than 50 articles on masks in the
medical literature and documenting her case, Dr Sherri Tenpenny concludes as
follows:
There are NO randomized, controlled trials (RCT) with
verified outcomes that show a benefit to healthcare workers or community
members for wearing a mask or a respirator. There is no such definitive study.
Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear
masks in public. See ‘Coronavirus Pt 4: Masks
Don’t Protect’ and, for your
convenience, Tenpenny has cited the relevant passage from 35 of the articles
she researched in this document: ‘Conclusion Regarding Masks:
They Do Not Work’.
But if you want to read more, you can access each of
the 50 articles Tenpenny cited or check out these as well: ‘Coronavirus: Face masks
could increase risk of infection, medical chief warns’ and ‘Coronavirus Fact-Check #6:
Does wearing a mask do anything?’
So if there is no virus and face masks do not work to
prevent infection anyway, why are we being told to wear them and, increasingly,
being terrorized into wearing them under threat of punishment if we do not? For
just two of many examples, see ‘Soon, You Will Need to Wear
a Mask to Enter Virtually Every Major Retail Store in America’ and ‘Total Masking: Victoria’s
Coronavirus Response’.
Because the face masks, like other elements of the
supposed strategy to tackle COVID-19, are simply being used to terrorize us
into not resisting the ongoing elite coup. See ‘The Mask as a Symbol of
Subjugation’, ‘The New (Pathologized)
Totalitarianism’ and ‘The Hidden Agendas of Masks,
Distancing, and Tracing’.
And it is largely working with most people projecting
their fear onto the non-existent ‘virus’ and then ignorantly endeavouring to
‘protect’ themselves from it by wearing a mask (or going along with other
measures supposedly intended to ‘prevent infection’).
So if you are wondering why virtually everyone is
being caught up in this, there are very good psychological reasons. One of them
is that virtually all humans are terrorized into obedience as children.
Consequently, resisting orders from those considered to be ‘in authority’ is
virtually unthinkable. I have explained this submissive obedience in the
article ‘Contemplating Human
Extinction Terrifies Most People: A Strategy for Survival’.
But there is another, more subtle, reason too.
COVID-19 and the Psychology of Projection
For the vast bulk of the human population, considering
the fundamental evidence of what is taking place – and acknowledging that the
global elite is conducting a coup against us with all that this entails – is
truly terrifying. Moreover, recognizing that if we are to resist this coup, we
will need to make a courageous and strategically-focused stand to defend
ourselves is frightening for most people as well.
And the global elite knows this. It is for this reason
that they are terrorizing us in the first place. The elite does not want people
resisting the coup and it certainly does not want them resisting the coup
effectively.
Hence, the global elite is exploiting our fear – by
projecting it onto COVID-19 – so that we submissively go along with its coup.
How is the elite doing this? Let me explain the psychology of projection, very
simply.
If, when you are a child, you are scared of something
but that ‘something’ is truly terrifying and inescapable – that is, you are
denied any safe opportunity to feel your terror and to take action in response
to it so that you can make yourself safe – your mind will precipitate one
response and, if necessary, a second response to defend you in the short term.
The first response will be to significantly dampen
(and possibly completely suppress) your awareness of just how terrifying the
‘something’ that is scaring you actually is so that you are not overwhelmed to
such an extent that you become incapacitated. This response is intended to
enable you to act powerfully to get yourself out of the terrifying situation
and into a context in which you feel safe.
Ideally, following any such incident when you again
feel safe, you need time to recover emotionally. Fundamentally, this means that
you need time to focus on feeling the terror and other feelings that were
raised during the incident so that these feelings are fully felt and expressed,
rather than suppressed more deeply into your unconscious.
If, however, there is no opportunity for this
emotional recovery, your mind will have no choice but to more deeply suppress
your awareness of these feelings so that you can resume functioning more or
less as previously. I say ‘more or less’ because you won’t be functioning
precisely as previously because the unconscious terror will now be playing a
part in your emotional life and, therefore, playing a part in shaping your
behaviour.
However, your unconscious mind – which is enormously
powerful – has not given up on enabling you to heal from the terrifying
incident and, therefore, its second response is to later trick you into
believing that something else, that is far less frightening, is what is
really scaring you so that you can safely access and feel your terror in
relation to the original incident. Your mind does this so that the terror that
was initially suppressed, in order to allow you to devise and implement a
strategy for immediate survival, can now be released.
By using these two responses, your mind enables you to
survive in a terrifying environment so that, hopefully at some point soon, you
can devise and implement a strategy to escape that environment. But also by
allowing you to subsequently believe that something that is actually quite safe
by comparison is what was really scaring you in the first place, it gives you
the opportunity to feel your fear and act it out without (or with profoundly
reduced) fear of the consequences.
In the short term, this pair of responses by your mind
can enable you to survive something truly terrifying: it minimizes the risk
that you will be immobilized (frozen) in terror and thus unable to survive a
dangerous situation. In essence, in evolutionary terms, these responses have
tremendous survival value in the short term.
If, however, you are not able to escape the truly
terrifying situation in the short term and you remain trapped in the situation
indefinitely, your unconscious mind will continue to both suppress awareness of
the terror and ‘trick’ you into subsequently believing that it is something
else that is frightening you.
Unfortunately, beyond the very short term, this mental
trick is highly dysfunctional. It leads the individual to eventually ‘forget’
(deeply suppress their awareness of) the original and true source of what is
terrifying them and to believe that the safe ‘target’ they unconsciously chose
subsequently is actually the genuine threat.
In the jargon of psychology, this is called
‘projection’ or ‘transference’ because the victim is now blaming something
other than the true cause of their terror.
This has profound societal consequences too for the
simple reason that an elite can effectively nominate the ‘something’ onto which
our terror is projected. And it can do this very easily by simply parading a
target or ‘legitimized victim’ as terrifying which, in effect, gives
‘permission’ for us to feel scared of the target it has nominated. But in
directing our fear in a certain direction, they are also invariably intent on
manipulating our behaviour in response.
Historically, this has been demonstrated rather
endlessly with the manipulation of our fear crucial to the achievement of
certain elite ends, politically and otherwise. For example, racism (fear of
other far less frightening Africans) exploded to justify the slave
trade, Nazism exploited fears to mobilize Germans against far less
frightening Jews (among others), Israeli leaders project the fear of
Israelis to exploit far less frightening Palestinians and the entire US
‘war on terror’ has been conducted on the basis of projecting people’s
unconscious terror at far less frightening Muslims. As I mentioned,
however, the list of possible examples is virtually endless.
In each and every case, however, the terror exploited
had its origin in something much earlier in the life of these individuals than
the current circumstance exploited by elites. It had its origin during early
childhood.
And this origin can be traced directly back to the
parenting and teaching models virtually universally used by human beings. As I
have explained many times previously, but to briefly reiterate here: virtually
all human beings are terrified for the same reason: the child-raising process
that sociologists like to label ‘socialization’ should be more accurately
labeled ‘terrorization’. This is because from the moment of a child’s birth,
parents, teachers, religious leaders and adults generally regard themselves as
responsible for terrorizing the child into obedience of the commands, rules,
conventions and laws that define the nature of permissible behaviour in their
society.
But because evolutionary pressures do not predispose
any individual to obey the will of another – for the simple reason that
obedience has no evolutionary functionality – it takes enormous
terrorization during childhood to ensure that the child surrenders their
Self-will at the alter of obedience. To achieve this outcome and largely
unknowingly, parents, teachers, religious leaders and other adults in the
child’s life use a large range of behaviours from the three categories of
violence that I have labeled ‘visible’ violence, ‘invisible’ violence and
‘utterly invisible’ violence. See ‘Why Violence?’ and ‘Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice’.
At its most obvious, all children are routinely
threatened with violence and actually punished with violence (usually in each
of its three forms: ‘visible’, ‘invisible’ and ‘utterly invisible’) for
‘disobedience’ (that is, for following their own Self-will rather than obeying
orders to submit). See ‘Punishment is Violent and
Counterproductive’.
And, as preposterous as I know this sounds to those
reading it for the first time: The fundamental outcome of this process is that
all children end up utterly but unconsciously terrified of their parents,
teachers, religious figures and other significant adults in their life.
But never given adequate safe opportunities to feel
this terror, each child ends up projecting it onto something or a series of
targets including those ‘legitimized victims’ approved by an elite, local or
otherwise.
Hence, in the current world context, this results in
the bulk of the human population submitting to direction by the global elite to
project their fear onto COVID-19 and then behave as ordered, rather than pay
attention to the elite coup and resist it. For summaries and documentation of
the evidence in relation to each of these points, see ‘The Elite’s COVID-19 Coup:
Fighting for Our Humanity, Our Liberty and Our Future’ and ‘The Elite’s COVID-19 Coup to
Destroy Humanity that is also Fast-Tracking Four Paths to Human Extinction’.
The elite does this by triggering our unconscious fear
through endless reporting of the ‘threat’ posed by COVID-19, issuing warnings,
announcing deaths supposedly caused by the ‘virus’ (and concealing that the
death rates are not even comparable to deaths caused by a serious influenza),
and placing increasingly onerous limits on our rights and freedoms (through
such measures as lockdowns and mask-wearing). And because virtually everyone
has so much suppressed terror and needs outlets onto which this can be
projected, the coup is being conducted virtually without resistance.
As I have explained before, just because the global
elite is able to do this does not mean that it is sane. In fact, it is
completely insane and that is precisely why it is conducting this coup but
unable to see its catastrophic outcome for the elite as well. See ‘The Global Elite is Insane
Revisited’.
So what can we do?
Well, if we are to effectively resist the elite coup
and fight for human survival, it would be useful to start by giving yourself
time to focus on feeling your emotional responses – fear, anger, sadness, pain,
dread…. – to whatever is generating an emotional reaction: COVID-19, the elite
coup, the imminent threats of extinction or anything else. See ‘Putting Feelings First’.
This is necessary so that you can engage meaningfully
and strategically in the effort, whatever issue you choose to fight.
So once you have a clearer sense of your emotional
reactions to this knowledge and have allowed yourself time to focus on feeling
these feelings, you will be in a far more powerful position to consider your
response to the situation. And, depending on your interests and circumstances,
there is a range of possible responses that will each make an important
difference.
Fundamentally, you might consider making ‘My Promise to Children’ which will include considering what an education for
your children means to you, particularly if you want powerful individuals – not
ones who are submissively obedient and project their terror – who can perceive
reality and resist violence. See ‘Do We Want School or
Education?’
You might consider supporting others to become more
powerful. See ‘Nisteling: The Art of Deep
Listening’.
If you wish to strategically resist the elite coup
against humanity, you can read about nonviolent strategy, including strategic
goals for doing so, from here: Coup Strategic Aims.
Remaining pages on this website fully explain the
twelve components of the strategy, as illustrated by the Nonviolent Strategy Wheel, as well as articles and videos explaining all of the
vital points of strategy and tactics, such asthose to help you understand ‘Nonviolent Action: Why and
How it Works’.
Given the complexity of the configuration of this
conflict, however, which involves the need to fight simultaneously to retain
our essential humanity, defeat the elite coup and avert near-term human
extinction, it is important that our tactical choices are
strategically-oriented (as are those listed at the Strategic Aims page
nominated above). Hence, three further considerations assume importance.
First,
choose/design tactics that have strategic impact, that is, they fundamentally
and permanently alter, in our favor, the power relationship between the elite
and us.
Second, when
tactical choices are made, focus them on undermining the elite coup, not just features
of it, such as ‘social distancing’ or the lockdowns. At its most basic, this
can be achieved by using tactical choices that mobilize people to act
initially, as is happening, but then inviting them to consider taking further,
more focused, action as well (such as those nominated in the strategic goals
referenced above). This is important because existing actions will have little
impact on key underlying measures, such as those being taken by the elite to
advance the fourth industrial revolution.
Third,
choose/design tactics that also have strategic impact on the greatest threats
to human survival, including the collapsing biodiversity on Earth, the threat
of nuclear war, the climate catastrophe and the deployment of 5G. Given the
incredibly short timeframe in which we are now working to avert human
extinction, while people are mobilizing it is important to use this opportunity
to give them the chance to perceive the ‘big picture’ of what is taking place –
beyond lockdowns and other measures supposedly being used to tackle COVID-19 –
and to act powerfully in response.
Fortunately, as more people become aware of the deeper
strands of what is taking place, the energy to break the lockdowns, resist
other limitations on our rights and freedoms (such as contact tracing, COVID-19
testing/temperature checks, mask-wearing and vaccinations) as well as resist
the coup itself will gather pace. As I have previously outlined, using a
locally relevant focus, or perhaps several, for which many people would
traditionally be together – a cultural, religious or sporting event, a
nonviolent action, a community activity such as working to establish a
community garden to increase local self-reliance, a celebration and/or a return
to work – we can mobilize people to collectively resist.
If you wish to focus on powerfully resisting one of
the primary threats to human existence – nuclear war, the deployment of 5G, the
collapse of biodiversity and/or the climate catastrophe – you can read about
nonviolent strategy, including strategic goals to focus your campaigns, from
here: Campaign Strategic Aims.
You might also consider joining those who are powerful
enough to recognize the critical importance of reduced consumption and greater
self-reliance as essential elements of these strategies by participating in ‘The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth’. While you over-consume or are dependent on the elite
for your survival, in any way, you are vulnerable.
In addition, you are welcome to consider signing the
online pledge of ‘The People’s Charter to
Create a Nonviolent World’.
Or, if you want something simpler, consider committing
to:
The Earth Pledge
Out of love for the Earth and all of its creatures,
and my respect for their needs, from this day onwards I pledge that:
2. I will not travel by plane
3. I will not travel by car
4. I will not eat meat and fish
5. I will only eat organically/biodynamically grown
food
6. I will minimize the amount of fresh water I use,
including by minimizing my ownership and use of electronic devices
7. I will not own or use a mobile (cell) phone
8. I will not buy rainforest timber
9. I will not buy or use single-use plastic, such as
bags, bottles, containers, cups and straws
10. I will not use banks, superannuation (pension)
funds or insurance companies that provide any service to corporations involved
in fossil fuels, nuclear power and/or weapons
11. I will not accept employment from, or invest in,
any organization that supports or participates in the exploitation of fellow
human beings or profits from killing and/or destruction of the biosphere
12. I will not get news from the corporate media
(mainstream newspapers, television, radio, Google, Facebook, Twitter…)
13. I will make the effort to learn a skill, such as
food gardening or sewing, that makes me more self-reliant
14. I will gently encourage my family and friends to
consider signing this pledge.
Conclusion
Under cover of a ‘virus’ that does not exist, the
global elite is social engineering a massive restructuring of world society to
suit their own ends. If they achieve their aim, your existence as any sort of
individual with meaningful rights and freedoms will have been terminated.
Apart from these ongoing disastrous outcomes, the
elite coup is also unwittingly accelerating four paths to human extinction:
nuclear war, the climate catastrophe, the deployment of 5G and biodiversity
collapse.
To have any chance of defeating the elite coup and
fighting effectively to avert our own extinction, we must fight strategically.
Fundamentally, this means recognizing that lobbying
(that is, begging) elite agents, such as governments, simply reinforces the
power of the elite to control us. It is only when we take action ourselves to
both build our own power (which includes that of our children and those with
whom we work) while campaigning strategically to undermine the power of the
global elite itself that we take crucial steps to liberate ourselves from its
violence, in all of the forms that this violence takes.
Given that the elite coup is jeopardizing our
individuality, our liberty and our future, it is time for us to decide whether
we are human beings or a planet of sheep.
Biodata: Robert J. Burrowes
has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has
done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings
are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of ‘Why Violence?’ His email address is flametree@riseup.net and his website is here.
Post a Comment