by Chris Hedges
Donald Trump is part of the
American
culture is built on a willful duplicity, a vision we hold of ourselves that
bears little resemblance to reality. Malcolm Bradbury wrote “that in America
imposture is identity; that values are not beliefs but the product of
occasions; and that social identity is virtually an arbitrary matter, depending
not on character nor an appearance but on the chance definition of one’s nature
or colour.” We founded the nation on genocide and slavery, ravage the globe
with endless wars and the theft of its resources, enrich an oligarchic elite at
the expense of the citizenry, empower police to gun down unarmed citizens in
the streets, and lock up a quarter of the world’s prison population while
wallowing in the supposed moral superiority of American white supremacy. The
more debased the nation becomes, the more it seeks the reassurance of oily con
artists to mask truth with lies.
Trump,
like most con artists, is skilled at manufacturing self-serving news and a
fictional persona that feed the magical aura of his celebrity. The showman P.T.
Barnum is the prototype of this strain of Americanism. In the 1830s, he
exhibited Joice Heth, an elderly African-American slave who
he claimed was the 161-year-old former nurse of George Washington. When Heth
lost her novelty, Barnum announced that what he had been displaying was a
robot. “The fact is, Joice Heth is not a human being,” he wrote to a Boston
newspaper, “… simply a curiously constructed automation, made up of whalebone,
india-rubber, and numerous springs ingeniously put together and made to move at
the slightest touch, according to the will of the operator. The operator is a
ventriloquist.” The crowds, which at their height had collectively paid $1,500
a week (then a huge sum) to see Heth, returned in droves to see the supposed
machine. After Heth died in 1836 at age 79 or 80, Barnum sold tickets to her
autopsy, which was viewed by 1,500 paying customers.
“[Barnum]
began to demonstrate the countless variations he would master in his numerous
publicity campaigns: the quick discovery, the barrage of rapid and unusual
information, the maximum exploitation—all these he utilized almost
immediately,” Neil Harris wrote in “Humbug: The Art of P.T. Barnum.” “It was
during Joice Heth’s tour that Barnum first realized that an exhibitor did not
have to guarantee truthfulness; all he had to do was possess probability and
invite doubt. The public would be more excited by controversy than
conclusiveness. The only requirement was to keep the issue alive and in print.
Any statement was better than silence.”
Barnum,
schooled in the wily deceits of Yankee peddlers and salesmen as a child in
Connecticut, also built the first temples to celebrities, including, in 1841,
the American Museum in New York City, which Twain called “one vast Peanut
stand” and said he hoped “some philanthropist” would burn down. Barnum was the
high priest of the polytheistic, secular religion of Americans and the creator
of kitsch as an aesthetic, characteristics that define Trump. Trump built his
own temples to celebrity and to himself, among them the Trump Taj Mahal casino
in Atlantic City and Trump Towers in various cities. Trump, like Barnum,
understood that celebrities and their relics function in American culture as
totems and magical talismans. He, as did Barnum, caters to the vulgarity of the
mob, elevating the salacious and the sleazy and claiming it is culture and art.
Confidence
men are adept at peddling fictions designed solely to attract publicity and
belittle their opponents. Trump’s demand for Barack Obama’s birth certificate
or Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test was not designed to uncover fact, but to
belittle and entertain. The release of Obama’s birth certificate and Warren’s
DNA finding did not puncture the lies. Old lies were replaced by new ones that
again catered to the emotional yearnings of the mob. The tawdry rumor that
Eliot Spitzer, the disgraced former governor of New York, wore black dress
socks when he was having sex with prostitutes was given currency by the
political operative and Trump confidant Roger Stone, cut from the same lump of
clay as Barnum and Trump. “What kind of guy does it with his socks on?” Stone
said to the New York Post.
In a
documentary film about Spitzer by Alex Gibney titled “Client 9” Gibney
interviews a prostitute, whose identity remains secret and whose words are read
by an actor, who said she had numerous liaisons with Spitzer and denied he wore
socks while having sex. Because of Stone’s comments, however, Spitzer felt
compelled to deny, in Gibney’s film and in public, that he wore socks while
having sex with prostitutes. The press had a feeding frenzy. Stone’s lie won by
being endlessly repeated.
Stone,
in the midst of the self-generated furor, wrote an article on Tucker Carlson’s
The Daily Caller website that attacked those who questioned his assertion:
In his
largely fictionalized movie, Gibney utilizes an actress to assert that Spitzer
never wore droopy black socks in his romps with prostitutes. Supposedly the
actress is mouthing the denial of a call girl that Gibney declines to identify
by her real name. That’s because Gibney has no source willing to put their name
on this lie. Gibney is not a journalist or filmmaker; he’s a left-wing
propagandist with the same disregard for facts as Oliver Stone. Spitzer’s black
sock fetish was previously confirmed by The New York Post on April 24, 2008,
when an FBI source confirmed the New York Democrat’s passion for knee-high hosiery,
which he declined to remove while engaging in paid-for sex. Gibney ignored this
fact in his well-made-but-false movie.
Stone,
like Trump, understands how to evoke images and emotional responses to
overwhelm reality and replace truth. Such lies and pseudo-events, because they
are so entertaining, are largely immune to deflation. Madison Avenue
advertisers and publicists use the same tactics to saturate the landscape with
skillfully manufactured illusions and false promises. The unmasking of the deceptions
only adds to their allure and power.
An
autobiography by Barnum, “Struggles and Triumphs,” which was published in 1869,
shamelessly details the sleights of hand and deceptions that made him very,
very wealthy. He understood, as he wrote in the autobiography, that “the public
appears disposed to be amused even while they are conscious of being deceived.”
This understanding underlies the popularity of entertainments such as
professional wrestling and reality television shows, along with Fox News, all of
which are premised on cons.
Con
artists like Barnum, Trump and Stone exploit everyone and everything around
them. When Barnum’s prize elephant Jumbo was killed by a train, he fabricated a
story about Jumbo sacrificing himself to save a baby elephant. He bought
another elephant, who he named Alice, and had pictures taken of her standing
next to the stuffed body of her martyred “husband.” The deception was so
outrageous and shameless that the public of that day, like a public that now
gorges itself on reports of Spitzer wearing black socks while having sex with
prostitutes, longed to believe it.
In our
Barnumesque culture, those who create the most convincing fantasies in the
cycles of nonstop entertainment are lionized. Those who puncture the fantasies
with the prosaic truth are condemned for spoiling the fun. These pseudo-events
and fabrications lift people up out of their daily lives into an Oz-like world
of fantasy. They destroy a civil discourse rooted in verifiable fact,
obliterating any hope of holding back the magical thinking that lies at the
core of all totalitarian societies.
Barnum
once asked E.D. Gilman, who had recently returned from the gold fields in
California, to give a talk on prospecting, the wages prospectors earned, the
equipment that was required and the living conditions. “While doing this,”
Harris wrote, “he was to pass his hand over a twenty-five pound lump of gold,
implying it was from California. Gilman replied that this would be humbug, for
seven ounces was the largest lump he had ever heard of. ‘My dear sir,” replied
the impresario, ‘the bigger the humbug, the better the people will like
it.’ ”
Thomas Low Nichols in a memoir described an
incident when Barnum was in desperate need of a blackface entertainer after his
white singer quit. All he could find to replace his white singer was a young,
talented black boy who danced and sang. It was impossible for Barnum to present
the genuine article, given the yearning for illusion and his shameless catering
to racial prejudice. Barnum “blacked and wigged” the boy, Harris wrote, so he
would pass for a make-believe African-American, “because the New Yorkers, who
applauded what they supposed a white boy in a blackened face and wooly wig,
would have driven the real negro from the stage and mobbed his exhibitor.”
Trump,
in a 2005 promotional video for a scam that made him about $40 million, employs
the familiar hyperbole of the con artist in declaring: “At Trump University, we
teach success. That’s what it’s all about—success. It’s going to happen to you.
We’re going to have professors and adjunct professors that are absolutely
terrific—terrific people, terrific brains, successful. We are going to have the
best of the best. These are people that are handpicked by me.”
Only
there was no university.
“The
faux university also did not have professors, not even part-time adjunct
professors, and the ‘faculty’ (as they were called) were certainly not ‘the
best of the best,’ ” David
Cay Johnston writes in “The Making of Donald Trump.” “They were
commissioned sales people, many with no experience in real estate. One managed
a fast food joint … two other instructors were in personal bankruptcy while
collecting fees from would-be Trump university graduates eager to learn how to
get rich.”
“Among investigator’s findings was that students who attended a ‘next level’seminar ‘are taught to prey upon homeowners in financial turmoil and to target foreclosure properties,’ ” Johnston writes. “They were also instructed, on the first morning of the three-day course, ‘to call their credit card companies, banks, and mortgage companies and ask for an increase or extension of credit so that they may finance the ‘Gold Elite’ package purchase. Defendant Trump U will even ask attendees to call their bank during these one-on-one sessions while the [Trump] representative waits. The primary goal of the 3-day seminar appears to be more high-pressure sales tactics in an attempt to induce them into purchasing Defendant Trump U’s ‘Gold Elite’ package for $35,000.”
Trump’s get-rich-quick schemes and seminars, including his books, were a con. Hiscasinos were a con. His paid speeches on behalf of self-help gurus such as TonyRobbins were a con. Tales of his sexual prowess, spread by himself masqueradingover the phone as a Trump spokesperson, were a con. His building projects werea con. Trump even had, Johnston writes, “imaginary employees.” Trump and hiskleptocrats and grifters are today triumphant, and neither democratic norms orsimply human decency will inhibit their pathological lust for more.
Perhaps it was inevitable that this poison would come to dominate our culture and our politics. It is the triumph of artifice. We live in an age when the fake, the fraudulent, the fabricated and the theatrical supplant reality. Trump’smanufactured persona was advertised on a reality television show. He sold this manufactured persona, as his ratings declined and he was in danger of being taken off the air, to become president. There are legions of agents
Chris
Post a Comment