China: Stumbling in Xinjiang

| by Col. R.Hariharan

( June 30, 2014, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) There are clear indications that the Chinese are stumbling in their effort to crush the Uighur struggle against the Han Chinese domination in Xinjiang.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) meets with Indian Vice President Mohammad Hamid Ansari in Beijing, China, June 30, 2014. (Xinhua/Zhang Duo)

The scrupulous semantics used by Chinese state-controlled media describe them as terrorists though the attacks lack the sophistication of modern day terrorism. It has not helped to cover up the Chinese failure to give confidence to the restive "minority" Uighurs who form a majority in Xinjiang Autonomous Region in China's Northwest.

The way the Chinese have handled the "terror" carried out in Beijing in October 2013 is a case in point to understand all that is wrong with Chinese appraoch to tackling terrorism
.
The “terror attack” occurred when Usman Ahmet, a Uighur driving a jeep ploughed into a crowd of people near the Tienanmen Square in Beijing on October 28, 2013 killing three people and injuring 39 others. The driver and his mother and wife who were in the jeep also died on the spot. According to initial report, some eyewitnesses said the jeep was being chased by someone; it was probably trying to get away from the pursuer
.
The three Uighurs facing death row were found guilty of “leading a terrorist group and endangering public security.” Along with the driver of the fatal vehicle, they had “looked for guns and explosives in different places, watched terrorism videos and jointly planned terrorist acts such as blasts and killings in Beijing.”

Two others were sentenced to life and 20 years in jail respectively for guilty of “participating in a terrorist group and endangering public security. Three more Uighurs were sentenced to five to 10 years imprisonment for “participating in a terrorist group.”

The Beijing attack was not as deadly as the explosive attack carried out in Urumqi market on May 22, 2014. Thirty nine civilians were killed and 94 others injured in the attack. But the Beijing attack typifies the Chinese way of handling separatist extremism that goes by the name of terrorism in China.

It also shows the increasingly innovative ways in which Uighur separatists had taken their “operations’ beyond the confines of Xinjiang and in this case to the national capital
.
There is a problem with Chinese approach to unconventional warfare. In India where semantic niceties dominate the thought process on COIN, “extremism”, “militancy”, “insurgency” and “terrorism” often indicate how the state authority would like to handle the threat. However, to be fair to the Chinese, the fine line separating various types of anti-state violence is getting increasingly subsumed thanks to rise and spread of Jihadi terrorism worldwide.

But, by branding all acts of violence against the state as terrorism, the state response becomes heavy handed resulting in further alienation of the population. It also increases the dependence upon military strategies rather than evolving a holistic strategy to address political, sociological and economic issues that add substance to the Cause of separatism
.
This is what appears to be happening in Xinjiang. The statistics on terrorist attacks from the years 2009 to date published in the Global Times is revealing. This year so far the Chinese have attributed six incidents to the Uighur terrorists in the first six months as against seven in 2013 and two, three and one respectively in the years 2012, 2011 and 2009. This confirms the Chinese fear that after 2009 Uighur separatism is once again gathering mass to stage a comeback.

There was no incident in 2010 presumably because of the strong military crackdown after the anti Chinese riots that rocked Urumqi in July 2009. Casualties in the riots were heavy - 197 people killed and 1700 others injured while 633 houses and 627 vehicles were damaged.

The style of operations and weaponry used now indicate Uighur separatism is yet to articulate itself powerfully to become a terrorist movement. Some of the acts like the Beijing jeep “attack” where a whole family perished, look more like an act of desperation than a suicide attack of the Jihadi kind. It also underlines the continuing determination of some in Uighur society to assert their will against the powerful and insensitive state machinery in spite of all odds
.
Uighur extremism is also gaining more national visibility and making impact since 2013 - President Xi Jinping’s first year in office. Xi had a first-hand exposure to it when one of the three Uighur separatist outfits - the Turkestan Islamic party - carried out a knife attack and bombing in Urumqi city railway station on April 30. Three people lost their lives and 79 others were injured in the attack.

More importantly, the attack was timed to coincide with the visit of the President to Xinjiang, destablising the state for a while. So it was no wonder when Xi vowed to wipe out terrorism by making the state counter terrorism apparatus more professional and powerful at the regional and national levels
.
As though challenging the President, Uighur separatists carried out yet another explosive attack in Urumqi the very next month. It was even more deadly, killing 39 civilians and injuring 94 others. In its wake, the Chinese have launched a year-long crackdown on terrorism nationwide.

Now counter terrorism figures prominently in China’s national security schemes. It also finds a place in joint military exercises - big or small - with a whole range of countries extending from Russia to India to Thailand and Sri Lanka to the US. Counter terrorism cooperation has become an important part of in China’s bilateral discussions with heads of governments, particularly neighbouring countries including India.

At times the over emphasis on military approach has resulted in overkill; a typical example is the arrest of a prominent Uighur intellectual Ilham Tohti, a known advocate of non violence and supporter of dialogue between the ethnic communities, in January 2014. He is now held incommunicado in Xinjiang, facing a secret trial.

Despite these efforts, the Chinese seem to be running into trouble in handling Uighur separatism. Their intelligence agencies do not seem to have their ears to the ground to forewarn them of impending separatist strike. The successful execution of a daring attack in Urumqi during the President’s visit is a case in point. This speaks of poor interface between the Han Chinese and the minority populations.

There is also a need to address the economic alienation of Uighurs from the Chinese development story. Chinese have a long tradition of settling disbanded units of Han Chinese dominated army in border regions. This practice has boosted the Han Chinese population in Xinjiang particularly in the 70s during the period of fractious relationship with Soviet Union
.
The Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) originally formed out of the disbanded military settlers has emerged as powerful economic and semi-military government loose cannon. It has administrative authority over several cities and settlements and farms. It operates outside the control of the government of the autonomous region making a mockery of the much touted Uighur autonomy. Its exclusive preference for Han Chinese makes it a powerful external factor furthering the alienation of Uighurs
.
Thus over the years, despite a lot of lip service to national unity, functional relations between the Han Chinese immigrants and the Uyghur regional majority have not developed on equitable basis. This feeling of alienation was further compounded by the state’s short sighted restrictions on religious practices of Uighur Muslims in the wake of 2009 trouble. This is a dangerous trend as it could push the Uighur separatists into the arms of Taliban fundamentalism which is expected to rise in the wake of American troop pullout from Afghanistan this year. So time is running out for the Chinese to rethink their strategies in Xinjiang.

Basically Chinese have to adopt a holistic approach to include ‘winning the hearts and minds of the people’ as a part of the COIN effort. The Global Times editorial in 2013 had some sane advice on this. It said: “Winning the hearts of the public in sensitive areas has decisive significance. Xinjiang needs to mobilize people from all of society to launch an anti-terrorism fight…The July 5 riots in Xinjiang in 2009 left a deep scar between the Han and the Uighur. The estrangement between the two will be constantly used by extreme forces who have been trying to turn it into the deep-rooted social causes for their violent and terrorism activities there.

“The whole country should be dedicated to dissolving the estrangement, which is the key to Xinjiang's long-term stability. We should also make Xinjiang people acknowledge the harm of such estrangement and that extreme forces are violators of the interests of the Uighur people. Meanwhile, various places in Xinjiang should appoint a certain number of police from ethnic minorities. The Uighurs should be made to believe that they are trusted members of the Chinese populace.”

We know from our own experience in Nagaland and Mizoram that no amount of military crackdown alone can uproot the feeling of alienation and separatism unless holistic efforts are made to nurture the feeling of inclusivity among the alienated so that they join the national mainstream.

This process requires a lot of patience and continuity. And Xinjiang is no exception to this. So one can only hope someone in authority take the Global Times advice to heart and put in an out of the box plan for Xinjiang. Otherwise the Chinese are going to find it more and more difficult in handling Uighur separatism.

Written on June 19 and updated on June 30, 2014

(Col R Hariharan, a retired Military Intelligence specialist on South Asia, is associated with the Chennai Centre for China Studies and the South Asia Analysis Group. E-Mail: colhari@yahoo.com Blog: http://col.hariharan.info& http://hariharansintblog.blogspot.in )

How to Create the Ideal Government & Society

| by Roger Copple

( June 30, 2014, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian ) This article is not specifically about the exploited working class, the disappearing middle class, or the still-controlling ruling class. Instead, it is about describing how local, state, and the national governments can be improved, preferably under a new national constitution. It is not just about government; it expresses my worldview on several topics.

Some hardcore pragmatists and realists think it is foolish to contemplate ideas that may take 100 years to implement. But to idealists--visualizing the actual goal or dream is what energizes us. In the first half of this long article (I apologize), I identify some of the major political and religious groups in the United States; and then, in the second half, I propose a fair system that levels the political playing field among these diverse groups.

One political group consists of the paleoconservatives; many of its adherents may not even use this term to describe themselves. Like our founding fathers who said our nation should not get entangled in the affairs of foreign governments, paleoconsevatives are Republicans who are against the interventionist foreign policy of the neoconservative Republicans. Neoconservatives believe that our government has a right, even a moral obligation, to police the world. Though Republicans and Democrats have well-known, definable differences regarding taxes, general spending, and social policies, many individuals from both parties favor a neoconservative foreign policy. The neoliberal foreign policy of Democrats is roughly the same as the neoconservative foreign policy of Republicans. Both are imperialistic. It’s okay for the United States to intervene in the affairs of other sovereign nations, they reason, because we’re the “good” guys.

For those who view the world as a place where dog eats dog, the neoconservatives are right. But Buddhists, yogis, Christian mystics, non-radical Muslims, and other peace-practicing groups would say that, if we take the initiative in showing compassion and benevolence, other individuals and nations will reciprocate with corresponding sentiments, sooner or later. Love conquers all.

Paleoconservatives are socially conservative, so they are less likely to support gay and abortion rights and the legalization of marijuana. They may be concerned about things like genetically modified foods that currently do not have to be labeled, and they are usually against putting more restrictions on gun owners.

Paleoconservatives are quick to argue that our government is a republic with guaranteed individual rights, and it is not a democracy, they say. They will inform you that the word “democracy” is not in the constitution because our founding fathers feared the “mob rule” of a democracy. democracy, or rule by the majority, is what you have when two foxes and a chicken decide what’s for dinner. Paleoconservatives will argue that our constitution was not meant to be a “living” document that changes with the times. They fear a democracy that can take away their God-given rights if it is the decision of the majority.

The Libertarians are another political group. They are socially liberal, but economically they are conservative. They are more likely to support gay and abortion rights, and the legalization of recreational drugs. But economically, they are apt to recommend laissez-faire capitalism. They want a small government with the fewest number of government regulations. Libertarians may want the liberty to become millionaires and billionaires through the free market. Libertarians oppose crony capitalism, which occurs when there is a collusion of private companies that get subsidies and special benefits from the government. Libertarians are also against the interventionist foreign policy of the Neoconservatives.

Fundamentalist and evangelical Christians are two religious groups that are combined as one group here. The fundamentalist churches interpret the Bible in the most literal way, even more so than the evangelical churches do. But both have a pre-seventeenth century, or pre-Enlightenment Age, viewpoint of the Bible—believing in a fiery, eternal hell for the lost who refuse to take Jesus as their Lord and Savior. They believe that abortion in most cases, and homosexuality, are sinful practices. Evolution is wrong, because it contradicts the first few chapters in the Book of Genesis.

The problem that pastors often have is that if they tell their congregation everything they learned in seminary (that is, if it was a liberal seminary) about the latest scientific research on the Bible, many of the lay people would stop attending and go somewhere else for reassurance, if their entrenched beliefs were challenged. For many people it is, or was, difficult to face the truth and give up certain childhood Christian beliefs. But even after the initial shock and inner turmoil that results when Christians learn what scientific Bible scholars say about the Bible, self-identifying Christians can still grow spiritually: They can become better citizens with broader political views when they stop believing that their religion is the one and only way.

For example, given the way most conservative Christians interpret the Bible, Israel plays an important role in the events leading up to the so-called Battle of Armageddon, the Rapture, and the Second Coming of Jesus. For this reason, conservative Christians often reflexively support Zionism and military assistance to Israel.

The Tea Party movement is primarily concerned about deficit spending. Every year that our government spends more money than it earns from tax revenues, it creates an annual deficit. Since our government has borrowed and spent more money than it has earned year after year, it has caused our national debt to skyrocket out of control. This is why Tea Partiers want to reduce government spending and taxes, even though many people might benefit if the government spent money to create jobs that are unavailable in the private sector. Of course, we could easily balance the budget every year if we dramatically reduced military spending.

According to www.WarResisters.org/pages/piechart.htm , 36% of the federal budget goes to the current military, and18% for past military spending, making a total of 54% of the federal budget spent on the military (and this does not include the $200 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan war spending). Reducing military spending is not an option for many Tea Partiers since many of them believe that a very strong military should be a top priority. Before he died, foreign policy expert Chalmers Johnson said that about 30 percent of military spending is secretive, unknown even to members of Congress.

Based on the history of our military and the covert operations of the CIA since the end of World War II, according to foreign policy expert William Blum, the American people would be appalled and ashamed (or at least they should be) if they learned the details about how our government has coerced other countries over the years. In the past, we believed we had to stop the sinister and exaggerated “international communist conspiracy.” Now the new bogeyman is “the war on terrorism.”

As a result, socialism or communism, since it first began in Russia in 1917, has never been allowed to rise or fall on its own merits because our government has had the power to undermine it in extremely unfair ways—using disinformation, sabotage, torture, assassination, election tampering, whatever it takes, whenever it, or a semblance of it, erupts in some remote corner of the world. This is your taxes at work! Now we know that it was not just the Russians who were getting a lot of propaganda during the cold war. We Americans were too, maybe even more. Totalitarian socialism is not true socialism, which can only be implemented through a democratic process. Perhaps the former Soviet Union, China, and North Vietnam would have become less totalitarian if they had not been so viciously attacked and undermined by the United States.

Another group, which I personally endorse, consists of the New Age movement. New Agers often talk about the importance of making a paradigm shift in consciousness. That is, they believe we each can experience a higher state of consciousness called the Universal Mind, which makes the ordinary consciousness experienced by separate individual minds seem less real, or even illusory. Meditation helps one achieve a calm, objective, detached, and nonjudgmental awareness which enables a person to identify with this Universal Mind.

Actually experiencing this Universal Oneness is like coming home to the true Self that had been there all along. And we can return to that consciousness whenever we let go of our selfishness and prideful ego. By always trying to get more or be more than anyone else, this ego creates duality, separateness, and suffering.

This Universal Oneness is identical to the perennial philosophy of Aldous Huxley, the Atman and Brahman of the Hindus, the samadhi of yogis, the nirvana of Buddhists, and the inner Kingdom of God of Christian mystics. These sublime states are supported by the findings of quantum physics and the growing scientific research on Near Death Experiences and parapsychology.

Moreover, in recent months there has been a resurgence of interest in psychedelic drugs such as peyote and ayahuasca, which can provide a foretaste of this Cosmic Consciousness. Such drugs have been used as an effective treatment for alcoholism and physical drug addiction, and these plant-derived drugs often help people overcome the fear of dying. But in order for these treatments to be successful, a proper mental set in a therapeutic setting is necessary. Unfortunately, those conditions are difficult to meet in the United States, since the drugs and the treatments are illegal here.

Many advocates of the New Age movement are apolitical, and unfortunately, without remorse. Some refuse to learn about current events because they do not want to incorporate any “negativity” into their lives. In the book Mindful Politics: A Buddhist Guide to Making the World a Better Place, edited by Melvin McLeod, we find these words at the beginning of section one:

We are all equal, says the Dalai Lama (I learned recently that the Dalai Lama advocates a synthesis of Marxian economics and Buddhism), in seeking happiness and peace. Yet as individuals and as nations, we value our own happiness over all others’. This is called “ego” in Buddhism and it is the root of our suffering, both personal and collective. He proposes a new approach to global politics based on taking responsibility for the happiness of all people.

Thus, if apolitical, New Age individuals stay calm, detached, objective, and centered in serenity, they should be able to cope with current events and even engage in political thinking. In the Introduction of the book described above, Melvin McLeod said, “It’s not treaties that will really bring peace in the Middle East. It’s not legislation that will really change the lives of those who live in poverty and misery. It is only forgiveness, generosity, awareness, kindness, and selflessness that will really make a difference.” A few pages back, in the Introduction on page 11, McLeod writes, “We have to recognize that we can’t really change the world. We can’t really change who others are and what they think. We can only work with our own heart and mind. But the transformative power of that is extraordinary.”

Since I haven’t read the rest of the book, I am expecting and hoping that the other writers in the book will emphasize that we should still, nevertheless, keep working to create better legislation and better treaties. I contend that we need both an inward transformation and a radical change in government at all levels.

The last group I identify consists of the progressives and leftists of various Socialist, Communist, and Green Parties. I have a kinship with this group also. Its concern for ecological sustainability, social justice, egalitarianism, and a non-interventionist foreign policy is urgently needed. Probably most leftists do not practice meditation and prayer, nor believe in a higher Self and in reincarnation. But as secular humanists, agnostics, and atheists, leftists can be just as ethical as other groups that engage in various spiritual practices.

With so much diversity and so many different worldviews within the United States, it is no wonder why the Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex, or the wealthiest one percent, can easily manipulate and maintain control of the disparate masses. Based on current trends, some would argue that the world is becoming a prison for the 99 percent. They point to the passage of laws that increasingly restrict our free speech, and to the increase in surveillance and Homeland “Security.” Meanwhile, third world nations are being plundered and exploited, and corporate capitalism is destroying the planet’s environment.

Creating Unity With So Much Diversity

So what is the solution? Average Americans must realize the importance of democracy, especially consensus and participatory democracy, whenever possible. Somewhere--if not at home, then at school—everyone should learn conflict resolution skills. Our government must become both a democracy and a republic, that is, a democratic republic. It must be a democracy that provides guaranteed human rights that the so-called “mob” cannot deprive individuals of, and it must be a republic in which our leaders, who represent larger groups of people, will actually represent all the people, and not just the wealthiest.

The American people must realize that there are “blowback” repercussions if we police the world and exploit the labor and resources of other countries for the benefit of our transnational corporations. If by using a black budget, the CIA is sabotaging democratically elected governments of developing countries that refuse to be client states of the United States, we the citizens, who allow our government to do this, can expect to reap the consequences of what our government has sown. Would we want a foreign government to have large military bases on our land? Of course not! So why do we think the people of other nations welcome our bases on theirs?

There must be gender equality and respect for alternative sexual preferences. To reduce the forces of domination and hierarchy, our institutions and organizations can be built from the bottom-up, not the top-down, whenever possible.

There is one branch of government that is most responsible for our plight, but potentially it is the most powerful branch of government that can actually rectify most of our many social and economic problems: the national legislative branch or the U.S. Congress. Currently only ten percent of Americans approve of Congress, which is quite pathetic.

We have to take responsibility for allowing the one percent to control us. We need to recognize that although the members of Congress enjoy the pay, prestige, and perks of the job, they need financial contributions in order to get reelected. The wealthy one percent is able to donate the most money, which they do as long as members of Congress do their bidding. So the American people must realize the importance of taking all money out of politics, so that congress can fulfill its rightful role of meeting the needs of the many groups in our society. In short, the best political remedy for our local communities, our nation, and the world is to force the U.S. Congress to maximize democracy and promote world peace.

The following recommended amendments and laws, expressed as demands, can be made of members of Congress, even if it takes several generations for some of them to be implemented. These demands could be the basis for a new political party, which could be called the New Congress Party. If no other political party sees the need to make these specific demands of the U.S. Congress, then a new political party is needed. If an existing political party can adopt these demands, then starting a new political party is not necessary. To make radical improvements, radical changes must be made—the sooner the better. Here are some of the most important demands to make of Congress.

1. Take leadership to dismantle all nuclear weapons and nuclear energy power plants, simultaneously and voluntarily, the world over as soon as possible.

2. Bring home all U.S. troops and close down the government’s 700 military bases around the world. Even with such a drawdown, our nation would retain more than enough capacity to defend its own borders. The money previously spent on the military would be used to create jobs and rebuild our nation’s infrastructure: “[A]nd they shall turn their swords into ploughshares.” (Isaiah 2:4) Many of our existing military ships, submarines, and planes can be used for low-budget travel and tourism.

3. Remove the influence of private financial contributors and of corporate lobbyists on members of Congress that they have had in the past. Instead, the Library of Congress will create a website that will become an online forum and clearinghouse for all public policy proposals. All positions and arguments will be publicized. Everyone will know who is lobbying for what and why. And also, publicly provide the same finances to the political campaigns of the seven largest, national political parties, and give all seven parties equal public exposure.

4. Elect the U.S. House of Representatives through a system of proportional representation, and abolish the U.S. Senate: Why should California and Wyoming have the same number of senators when California’s population is about 70 times greater? Implementing this may require a constitutional convention, since senators may not want to pass an amendment that abolishes the U.S. Senate. These measures are necessary to create the ideal government.

The seven largest, national political parties will be empowered in a single-chambered, national legislature. Under proportional representation, the National Green Party, for example, may get 15 percent of the vote, or 65 members, in the 435-membered House of Representatives, and Indiana’s population currently allows it to have ten members in the House of Representatives. But it may be that of the top seven national political parties, the Indiana Republican Party will get to select and send five of Indiana’s ten representatives to the House of Representatives because Indiana is a conservative state.

5. Abolish the electoral college system for electing a president. A president must win with a majority of individual votes (not just a plurality of votes) using the method of instant runoff voting, in which each voter will rank slated candidates from most favorite to least favorite. And it may take two or more rounds of voting to eliminate the candidate with the least amount of votes, until eventually one of the remaining candidates captures at least 51 percent of the vote.

6. Limit the terms for Supreme Court judges to four years, but allow judges to serve multiple terms.

7. Implement a decentralized, non-hierarchical, or grassroots, approach to public schools: The neighbors who live within the boundaries of each public elementary, middle, and high school will be forced, or allowed, to democratically establish their own school philosophy and curriculum, using public funds. There will no longer be federal, state, county, or township control of neighborhood schools. This should improve neighborhood togetherness, as neighbors ideally become tribal, in a new and modern way.

Local neighborhood groups would probably search the Internet and study the most effective schools and various school curriculums. Residents would be forced to think independently and philosophically. In the process, neighbors would get to know one another better, and they would build a close-knit community. Parents, other residents, and senior citizens would become better educated citizens, as they strive to become better teachers and tutors in the neighborhoods where they live. The current reliance on public school “experts” who dictate when, how, what, where, and who can teach has not worked well for teachers, students, parents, and our society.

8. Abolish the Federal Reserve and allow the Treasury Department to oversee a publicly owned banking system like the existing Bank of North Dakota. Currently the Federal Reserve has pumped $16 trillion into the central banking system to bail out the banks and big corporations, as many people wonder, “Where is my bailout?”

9. Strive to establish a democratic world federal government that provides equal pay for equal work, with no one earning more than three times the wages of the lowest paid worker. We only get cheaper prices at Walmart because someone in Bangladesh or in some other impoverished place is working for about 17 cents an hour. Is that fair? This policy will eliminate the extremes of poverty and wealth and provide adequate food, housing, and jobs for all citizens of the world. Moreover, the world map can be divided into 500 rectangular-shaped, legislative districts of equal population to create a World Legislative Council. This World Legislative Council could then make executive and judicial branch appointments.

Until the World Legislative Council is established, the United Nations should be changed so that all nations can participate in making all decisions, giving each nation one vote. The five nations that are permanent members of the Security Council within the United Nations have too much power. All nations should participate in Security Council decisions.

10. Implement a progressive income tax up to 94 percent for any income amounts over $100,000 with a simplified tax code.

11. Phase out fossil fuels through government incentives.

12. Provide free post high school, public education for students whose parent(s) have an annual income of less than $100,000.

13. Legalize commercial hemp, medical marijuana, and the private use of marijuana for adults, on a national level. If marijuana is safer, why are we driving people to drink?

14. Call for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 with subpoena powers, especially in regards to Building 7, which was not even hit by a plane, but fell at the speed of gravity into its own footprints at 5 pm on that tragic day. And Building 7 was not even mentioned in the initial Official 9/11 Commission Report, an investigation that was not done until two years later and then by government insiders, with an extremely limited budget.

Nanothermite explosives were gathered from the World Trade Center debris shortly after the towers fell on 9/11 by Physics professor, Dr. Steven Jones. He and a team of nine scientists published their paper in the Bentham Chemical Physics Journal, which is respected by Nobel Laureates and other members of the scientific community. Also, the majority of 9/11 Commissioners now say the government lied about 9/11, according to the website www.investigate9ll.org.

15. Provide incentives for local, organic food production in backyards and front yards, and promote food cooperatives that provide locally grown food. Require that all genetically modified foods be labeled.

16. Provide the best research and incentives to the 50 states on the best ways they can rewrite their state constitutions and possibly restructure their state governments from the bottom-up, not the top-down: from the neighborhood block club, to the precinct, township, county, and state levels. Each level of legislative government could make executive and judicial branch appointments. Elected Representatives at each level would vote among themselves to send a representative to the next level above it. Giving more power to the legislature at each level may work better than the current policy in which many voters (if they even vote) vote a straight ticket for many minor offices, for candidates whom they know nothing about.

17. Empower the seven largest, national political parties, using a system of proportional representation to elect 100 individuals to meet at a Constitutional Convention to rewrite the U.S. Constitution, in which the delegates will work for three entire months to get a 51 percent or higher approval of any proposed, new constitution. (In other writings, this author has laid out a 23-month timeline for this process to occur). Without a 51 percent approval of the new constitution, the existing constitution will still stand.

18. Require workplace democracy in companies that have seven or more employees. Workers will participate in determining the company’s direction, employee wages, and the selection of bosses, instead of relying solely on a Board of Directors, who are bent on making a profit for shareholders and the company’s upper management.

19. Allow Americans to visit Cuba if they choose.

20. Stop the drone strikes, the Guantanamo torture prison, the abuse of the Patriot Acts and NDAA, needless NSA spying, and excessive security checks at airports.

21. Make buses and trains more affordable and available to reduce the number of cars and trucks on roads and highways.

22. Implement Single Payer health insurance with the federal government as the single payer. This will eliminate most private, health insurance companies, which are eager to make greater profits, while offering their members increasingly less coverage and benefits.

23. Support the Charter for Compassion, a document that transcends religious, ideological, and national differences. The Charter activates the Golden Rule around the world. Compassion asks us to go where it hurts, to enter into places of pain, to share brokenness, fear, confusion, and anguish. www.CharterForCompassion.org

24. Promote a new era of honesty, openness, transparency, trust, and voluntary vulnerability among national governments, within the United States government, and within interpersonal and business relationships. Government secrecy regarding UFOs, various assassinations, 9/11, CIA operatives, and military black budget expenditures must come to an end.

25. Encourage the personal investigation of meditation (which does not have to be associated with any particular religion), and the scientific study of Consciousness.

Conclusion

It has been said that the journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step. Well, that journey need not seem impossible. Consider that, for the first time, the American people recently expressed in the polls that they don’t believe the current lies and disinformation about why the U.S. should bomb Syria. And currently, let’s hope that the American people will realize that if it was wrong to bomb Iraq in 2003, it is wrong to bomb Iraq in 2014.

As more and more Americans wake up and stop relying on the mainstream media in the formation of their opinions, there is greater opportunity to reach the masses, especially the millions of Americans who don’t have jobs or who work at jobs that don’t pay living wages. The working class of America can be educated and recruited to demand that their members of Congress make these radical changes, or be voted out of office.

The U.S. Congress does not have to be permanently despised. Instead, an educated and empowered citizenry can help it become the ideal of the world. The Occupy Wall Street movement failed, at least in part, because it could not agree on specific demands to make of Congress. We have to be united in our common dreams and short term objectives.

As the gap between the rich and poor widens within a country and between countries, national and world problems increase accordingly. This is why I am adamant about reducing the economic gap even more than what current socialists and communists might advocate. But that is my preference. The democratic voice of the people may choose otherwise.

Living in a classless society where citizens love academic study, philosophical thinking, meditation, and voluntary simplicity, instead of conspicuous consumption, is my ideal. It would be accompanied by local, economic self reliance and local self-determination, undergirded by a modern type of tribalism. Still, I recognize that the democratic voice of the people may choose a more regulated type of capitalism with a greater focus on individualism—even after the empowerment of the seven largest national political parties.

Advocating neighborhood control of neighborhood schools to the extent that I have advocated is unprecedented. I have not found a single educational philosopher who recommends it. Even the first public schools had elements of top-down control. But just because it has never been tried does not mean it can never work.

With so much diversity, can there be unity and peace in the world? There can be unity and peace, and even happiness in the world, in spite of all the diversity. But, to achieve it—we each must find a way (through meditation, prayer, daily attitude, selfless service, or a combination of these things) to be inwardly joyful and also loving and kind in our interpersonal relationships.

But more than this is required: As responsible citizens, we must consider it our civic duty to maximize democracy (in the ways described above) and do the things that promote world peace and world happiness (as described above). It is better to think of what is best for the world and the planet than only what is best for ourselves and our own country. Democracy, of course, can only work if the citizens are well educated.

If the New Congress Party expresses the values and advocates the changes that you believe can create the ideal society and world, feel free to print and share this article. To officially register the New Congress Party as a third party in your state, you can contact your state voting office. Usually it only requires about three or four residents to officially serve as Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, Secretary, and Treasurer. It has not been established yet in any state.

Roger Copple is 64 years old. He retired 4 years ago in 2010 from teaching general elementary, mostly 3rd grade, for half of his teaching career and high school special education during the other half, mostly in Indianapolis. Roger can be emailed at rogercopple@gmail.com ; his website is www.NowSaveTheWorld.com

The World Is Sick Of Israel And Its Insanities

Israel is discovering that it’s no longer the center of attention
 as it always was before.

| by Gideon Levy

( June 29, 2014, Tel Aviv, Sri Lanka Guardian) What a cruel world: Three yeshiva students were kidnapped, and the world isn’t interested; three mothers are crying out, and the world doesn’t answer. It’s all because the entire world is against us; it’s anti-Semitic and hates Israel. The Anti-Defamation League is already preparing a report. But the truth is, that’s just the way things are: When you openly thumb your nose at the world for years on end, eventually, it thumbs its nose back.

The three mothers went all the way to Geneva. One of them went abroad for the first time in her life to go to the United Nations Human Rights Council. But the world, and the council, went on their merry ways. It’s the irony of fate: About two years ago, Israel officially suspended cooperation with that council; together with the Marshall Islands, Palau and the U.S., it opposed the council’s very establishment. But now, in its distress and the mothers’ distress, it has turned to the council, which is indeed hostile to Israel and spends more time on it than on any other country. Suddenly, Israel needs the world. It even needs the UN, which all of a sudden isn’t the worthless body Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion once termed it.

It takes considerable effrontery to demand that the world interests itself in the fate of three abducted Israelis, and considerable chutzpah to be disappointed by the fact that it has kept silent. Granted, Israel tried to move heaven and earth, and its ambassador/propagandist at the UN gave a moving speech in an effort to scrape up a few more public diplomacy points against Hamas. But once it was paying attention already, that bizarre world was more interested in the campaign of collective punishment imposed on thousands of West Bank residents after the kidnapping.

That’s the way things are with the world-that’s-entirely-against-us: It’s more interested in the half-century-old occupation; it’s more upset over the fate of three million Palestinians than the fate of three Israelis. The world has no lack of kidnapping victims, but none of them ever got the attention received by kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit. With the three current kidnap victims, however, Israel no longer had a chance. Over the last two weeks, which I spent in Sweden, I didn’t run across a single mention of the abduction in the media. Not one.

That’s what rotten fruit looks like. The world has no reason be more interested in the fate of Naftali Fraenkel, Eyal Yifrah and Gilad Shaar than it is in the fate of their age mate Mohammed Dudin, a boy of 15 who was killed by live fire from Israeli soldiers in Dura last Friday.

It has no reason to be especially moved by the haunting words of Rachel Fraenkel, who related that her Naftali is a good boy who loves to play guitar and soccer, when Mohammed was also a good boy, who helped his father build their house during his school vacations and sold sweets to help support his family. Rachel wants to hug Naftali? Jihad, Mohammed’s bereaved father, also wants to hug his son. Incidentally, nobody brought him to Geneva. He remained alone with his mourning, at the wretched house whose construction hasn’t yet been finished, and perhaps never will be.

The world is a mess, as they say. In Iraq, Nigeria, Syria and even Ukraine, the situation is far crueler. Yet the complete lack of interest in the kidnapped Israelis doesn’t stem from that alone. It’s impossible to demand sympathy from the world when Israel ignores the world’s decisions; it’s impossible to demand action when Israel is perpetuating the occupation; and it’s impossible to demand solidarity with the fate of Israeli victims when that same victimized Israel continues to kill, wound and arrest innocents as a matter of routine.

Now Israel is discovering that it’s no longer the center of attention as it always was before, and that the fate of its kidnapping victims no longer stops the world in its tracks, not even in the United States. The world is sick of Israel and its insanities. Unfortunately, the world has also lost interest in what happens here. When Israel was a more just country, the world identified with its victims. It continued to do so even when Israel became less just. But now, when Israeli rejectionism is hitting new heights and its oppression of the Palestinians is returning to what it was during the very worst periods, the world has started getting tired of it all. Even the kidnapped Nigerian girls interest it more.

© Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Uncommon Candidate

| by Maduranga Rathnayake
Views expressed in this article are author own

( June 30, 2014, Melbourne , Sri Lanka Guardian ) An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come; now who said that, Victor Hugo? Well, whoever who said that that is an interesting point.

Turning to present Sri Lanka (SL), it is humanly impossible to find a person who doesn’t wish a regime change. Superficially, of course, there are still so many who defend the regime. There is a reason for that. That is everyone is born honest but we become dishonest later mostly by choice and sometimes under compulsion. So, if you ask anyone in SL for his honest view, he would want a regime change. The problem is it is difficult to defeat the regime at an election even if it is free and fair for a change. You blame Ranil for that. You don’t blame the voters. Why, because the voters, unmistakably the Sinhala-Buddhist peasants, semi-urban and urban middle class, have been cast under a spell by the regime’s propaganda machinery. You blame Ranil for not being able to break the spell for so many years. So, there is the need for a common candidate to defeat the regime at a future presidential election. This is where SL is at this hour. Is that correct?

The SL society over the years has shown an extraordinary amount of servility in the face of deceit and corruption, and like as they say love is in the air, in SL deceit and corruption is in the air and everyone of us breathes it like a happy child would breathe fresh morning air; it is what we are and we love it. This social touchstone of corrupt-is-bliss did not come into use overnight, there had been a steady build-up in the last couple of decades through the failed south-youth armed uprising and the Tamils’ military revolt both being generously contributory, which only saw an intensified and a robust fully regime-backed phase in the years that came under the present regime, the chief characteristic being the emergence of an exclusive class immersed in a new sensation seeking decadence and peasants and a semi-urban and urban class satiated with simple pleasures deceit and corruption would bring them. As a result the SL society ceased to criticise, rationalise or at least theorise anything and had blissfully chosen to be self anaesthetised; it has been as good as death. Do we want to wake up? Yes, nevertheless are we prepared to wake up? The answer unfortunately is unclear.

The common presidential candidate concept as it were, is irreparably flawed. It is clear that the theoretical need for a common candidate had stemmed from the very need of a force, as opposed to Ranil yet including him as well, that can stand up to the almighty regime, and a common presidential candidate out of that force to fight the regime at a future election. The main flaw of this reasonably old strategy lies in the very foundation of the common platform, laughably being constitutional reforms. Of course, at an election the voters answer only the question put to them and getting the voters in the next presidential election campaign engrossed in a constitutional reform debate along with the usual economic hardship slogan may sound doable and perhaps even winnable, but it once again misses the point. Further, by bringing the main opposition in parliament being one of the two largest political forces in the country practically under a collective of small parties and small time political players certainly is strategically taking too much of a risk too. It must be stressed that what SL really needs at this hour is a total shift both in its outlook as well as substance in that a leadership that is a clear alternative to the present regime and certainly not a so-called force which may come out stronger than the present regime yet which won’t be able to deliver anything if voted into power as such a common force would inevitably be as fragile and totally messy as and would not be different at all to numerous standard coalitions we have seen in politics. It should never be forgotten that while a regime change is a must it is equally indispensable that SL shall have a leadership that can deliver and deliver without delay in terms of restoring the economy, public institutions, the judiciary, the international image and the multi-ethnic basis of the country. 

The several elections lost in the reason times by the main opposition in parliament should be viewed as significant opportunities the SL society missed rather than Ranil loosing elections. If one objectively evaluated the policies and the electoral eminence of the several potential common candidates whose names are being discussed ubiquitously one would, it is hoped, come to the realisation that Ranil in fact is the most uncommon candidate of the lot with his strong liberal views. If the so-called third, fourth etc. forces want to genuinely push for a regime change and bring about new culture in which freedom and democracy rules then they have little choice but to openly work out a common agenda based on freedom and democracy with the main opposition, as opposed to promoting a mere common candidate. What needs to be promoted is the idea that it’s time the SL society woke up and was liberated itself from the shackles of deceit and corruption. If what the opposition parties are searching for in the form of a common presidential candidate is a person who would speak to the gallery better than the Rajapasas then let us get ready for another disaster.

Say no to enforced or involuntary disappearance in Sri Lanka

| Following statement issued by the Law & Society Trust, rights body based in Colombo

Disappearance is far worse than death, because when a person dies, when I know that, so and so is dead, the story ends and somehow or other we close the chapter. But when a person has disappeared, it is an eternal suffering.
- Remark (5.18) made before the LLRC Commission in Jaffna on 12th November, 2010.

( June 30, 2014, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) It is unarguable that definitive action against alleged cases of enforced disappearances as well as preventive measures would have a significant impact on the reconciliation process. It is a fundamental need to ensure that lessons from past experiences be learnt so as to prevent any recurrence.

The Commission on Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation to support the drive towards national unity and reconciliation appointed by the President had made recommendations in its final report to adopt a comprehensive approach to address the issue of enforced disappearances (5.36, Chapter 5, Human Rights, Repot of the LLRC Commission).

As recommended by the LLRC Commission the President has appointed a Commission to investigate into complaints regarding missing persons (PCICMP) and thereafter to provide material to the AG to institute legal actions against perpetrators (9.51, Chapter 5, Principal observations and recommendations, Repot of the LLRC Commission) in order to ensure public security, well-being and non-occurrence of such acts in the future. It is expected that the Commission will submit its findings and recommendations on 15th August 2014.

The Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances has made several recommendations to the GoSL to eliminate enforced or involuntary disappearances (E/CN.4/2000/64/Add.1, 21 December 1999). Making the act of enforced disappearance an independent offence under the criminal law of Sri Lanka punishable by appropriate penalties as stipulated in article 4 of the United Nations Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, incorporating the prohibition of enforced disappearance as a fundamental right in the Constitution of Sri Lanka to which the remedy of a direct human rights complaint to the Supreme Court under article 13 of the Constitution is applied irrespective of the fact whether the disappeared person is presumed to be alive or dead and abolishing or amending the existing Prevention of Terrorism Act in line with internationally accepted standards of personal liberty, due process of law and humane treatment of prisoners.

Law and Society Trust, as a human rights organisation that contributes to the promotion, protection and advancement of human rights strongly urges that GoSL to implement the recommendations made by the Working Group and to ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICCPED) which communications from or on behalf of individuals subject to its jurisdiction claiming to be victims of a violation by this State Party of provisions of this Convention (Article 31.1).

As a human rights organisation that shares common goals of justice, equality, and human dignity with the GoSL and continues to support the GoSL’s effort to protect and promote human rights further urges that the GoSL should publish the finding and recommendations of the Commission and to implement the aforesaid recommendations as well as the recommendations by the Presidential Commission.

Furthermore, LST urges the GoSL not to restrain the search for the truth and provide reasonable compensation for the affected family once the sittings are concluded. In the mean time, LST emphasizes on the importance of issuing certificates of absence instead of death certificates for the missing or disappeared (LST already issued a media release on issuance of death certificates on March 31, 2014 ).

LST further highlights the right of the family members of the victims to know the whereabouts of their loved ones and steps taken by the government to find the fate and whereabouts. As stated in the United Nations Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, acts constituting enforced disappearance shall be considered a continuing offence as long as the fate and whereabouts of persons who have disappeared concealed by the perpetrators” (Article 17. 1 of the declaration).

It is axiomatic that if the GoSL is committed to its international obligations regarding the rights of family members of the disappeared as frequently stated in international forums, it is duty bound to ensure the above to the fullest extent possible.


Facebook reveals news feed experiment to control emotions

Protests over secret study involving 689,000 users in which friends' postings were moved to influence moods

| by Robert Booth
Courtesy: The Guardian, London

( June 30, 2014, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) It already knows whether you are single or dating, the first school you went to and whether you like or loathe Justin Bieber. But now Facebook, the world's biggest social networking site, is facing a storm of protest after it revealed it had discovered how to make users feel happier or sadder with a few computer key strokes.

It has published details of a vast experiment in which it manipulated information posted on 689,000 users' home pages and found it could make people feel more positive or negative through a process of "emotional contagion".

In a study with academics from Cornell and the University of California, Facebook filtered users' news feeds – the flow of comments, videos, pictures and web links posted by other people in their social network. One test reduced users' exposure to their friends' "positive emotional content", resulting in fewer positive posts of their own. Another test reduced exposure to "negative emotional content" and the opposite happened.

The study concluded: "Emotions expressed by friends, via online social networks, influence our own moods, constituting, to our knowledge, the first experimental evidence for massive-scale emotional contagion via social networks."

Lawyers, internet activists and politicians said this weekend that the mass experiment in emotional manipulation was "scandalous", "spooky" and "disturbing".

On Sunday evening, a senior British MP called for a parliamentary investigation into how Facebook and other social networks manipulated emotional and psychological responses of users by editing information supplied to them.

Jim Sheridan, a member of the Commons media select committee, said the experiment was intrusive. "This is extraordinarily powerful stuff and if there is not already legislation on this, then there should be to protect people," he said. "They are manipulating material from people's personal lives and I am worried about the ability of Facebook and others to manipulate people's thoughts in politics or other areas. If people are being thought-controlled in this kind of way there needs to be protection and they at least need to know about it."

A Facebook spokeswoman said the research, published this month in the journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the US, was carried out "to improve our services and to make the content people see on Facebook as relevant and engaging as possible".

She said: "A big part of this is understanding how people respond to different types of content, whether it's positive or negative in tone, news from friends, or information from pages they follow."

But other commentators voiced fears that the process could be used for political purposes in the runup to elections or to encourage people to stay on the site by feeding them happy thoughts and so boosting advertising revenues.

In a series of Twitter posts, Clay Johnson, the co-founder of Blue State Digital, the firm that built and managed Barack Obama's online campaign for the presidency in 2008, said: "The Facebook 'transmission of anger' experiment is terrifying."

He asked: "Could the CIA incite revolution in Sudan by pressuring Facebook to promote discontent? Should that be legal? Could Mark Zuckerberg swing an election by promoting Upworthy [a website aggregating viral content] posts two weeks beforehand? Should that be legal?"

It was claimed that Facebook may have breached ethical and legal guidelines by not informing its users they were being manipulated in the experiment, which was carried out in 2012.

The study said altering the news feeds was "consistent with Facebook's data use policy, to which all users agree prior to creating an account on Facebook, constituting informed consent for this research".

But Susan Fiske, the Princeton academic who edited the study, said she was concerned. "People are supposed to be told they are going to be participants in research and then agree to it and have the option not to agree to it without penalty."

James Grimmelmann, professor of law at Maryland University, said Facebook had failed to gain "informed consent" as defined by the US federal policy for the protection of human subjects, which demands explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject's participation, a description of any reasonably foreseeable risks and a statement that participation is voluntary. "This study is a scandal because it brought Facebook's troubling practices into a realm – academia – where we still have standards of treating people with dignity and serving the common good," he said on his blog.

It is not new for internet firms to use algorithms to select content to show to users and Jacob Silverman, author of Terms of Service: Social Media, Surveillance, and the Price of Constant Connection, told Wire magazine on Sunday the internet was already "a vast collection of market research studies; we're the subjects".

"What's disturbing about how Facebook went about this, though, is that they essentially manipulated the sentiments of hundreds of thousands of users without asking permission," he said. "Facebook cares most about two things: engagement and advertising. If Facebook, say, decides that filtering out negative posts helps keep people happy and clicking, there's little reason to think that they won't do just that. As long as the platform remains such an important gatekeeper – and their algorithms utterly opaque – we should be wary about the amount of power and trust we delegate to it."

Robert Blackie, director of digital at Ogilvy One marketing agency, said the way internet companies filtered information they showed users was fundamental to their business models, which made them reluctant to be open about it.

"To guarantee continued public acceptance they will have to discuss this more openly in the future," he said. "There will have to be either independent reviewers of what they do or government regulation. If they don't get the value exchange right then people will be reluctant to use their services, which is potentially a big business problem."

Mending fences with Muslims as rats desert Mahinda’s sinking ship

| by Pearl Thevanayagam

(June 30, 2014, Bradford UK, Sri Lanka Guardian) As UNHRC intensifies its probe into war crimes it is pertinent to note Sri Lanka is adding more ammo through its stubborn stance of militarising the whole nation. Just as it fortified North and East post-war and empowered its military towards re-constructing and repairing damaged properties thereby side-lining Tamils into providing them with employment in the process, it is doing the same in the South where Muslim properties were vandalised by dark elements of extremist Buddhist forces.

Two hundred million rupees are allocated to the military to repair the damage and destruction done to Muslims in the South which is half of the actual loss which is Rs 400 million according MP Azath Sally.

It is only fair that Muslims are entrusted with rebuilding their damaged properties and compensate for business losses and not the security forces. It is the security forces who remained silent throughout the mayhem caused by BBS.

As Muslims begin the fast in this Holy month leading to Ramadan the government would do very well to at least show some compassion as Lord Buddha preached and give hope to rebuild their lives. By entrusting the funds provided to give employment for Muslims the government might regain its lost confidence among the Muslims albeit too late.

The demonstration by diaspora Muslims in front of UN compound in Geneva will not go un-noticed. Rather it will strengthen evidence already available to pressurise the government into accounting for tis war crimes and injustice to minorities.

If Muslims do not want to go the same route as war –ravaged Tamils then it is incumbent on Muslim parliamentarians to immediately put a stop to military intervention in rebuilding the damaged Muslim South enclaves. Muslim nations have been alerted to the government’s strategy of enslaving minorities through recent anti-Muslim activities directly orchestrated by Gotabhaya, the Defence Secretary who is also entrusted with Urban Development Authority.

All signs out there show Sri Lanka is descending into a military state such as Myanmar and Pakistan under Musharaff.

Mainstream media and social blogs which earlier applauded the President for his victory over LTTE terrorism are now disgruntled with the government as is seen in the changing attitude of editorials. The government is bent on committing social suicide before the UNHRC probe begins in final investigations as is shown in recent upsurge of extremist Sinhala forces agitating and inciting hatred towards minorities.

Senior ministers within the government are showing discontent with the President’s increasing reliance on his empowering the family and the military to his own detriment.

The ministers Mahinda surrounds himself with have a history of bed-hopping. Forgetting the opposition, the enemies are his best mates at the moment. Before the blink of an eye the three armed forces can unseat the government as history in Myanmar and Pakistan proved.
The government will have nowhere to turn to when this happens.

If Tamil parties including upcountry Tamils and Muslim political groups join forces as is portended then this wold be the death-knell for the government and which is eagerly awaited by most Sri Lankans including the majority Sinhalese. Sri Lankans have had enough of the North Korean style of governance which is extravagant motor races in the close proximity of sacred places, granting license to operate Vegas style casinos and looking the other way when foreign prostitutes descend here as artistes and hostesses of gambling dens.

Even the government’s denial of providing visas to UNHRC team would not deter it from taking it before the International Criminal Court and its fate would not be different from those of Yugoslavia’s Slobodan Milosovic and several African and South East Asian leaders.

In its 2014 report US states The Fragile States Index ranks Sri Lanka in 30th place among 178 countries. This too will be added to the piles of evidence so far gathered against Sri Lanka.

(The writer has been a journalist for 25 years and worked in national newspapers as sub-editor, news reporter and news editor. She was Colombo Correspondent for Times of India and has contributed to Wall Street Journal where she was on work experience from The Graduate School of Journalism, UC Berkeley, California. Currently residing in UK she is also co-founder of EJN (Exiled Journalists Network) UK in 2005 the membership of which is 200 from 40 countries. She can be reached at thevanayagampearl@yahoo.co.uk)



India: Targeting NGOs

The timing and contents of the I.B. report naming select NGOs and individuals as working against the national interest exposes the Narendra Modi government’s pro-corporate plan to target organisations championing people’s causes that have not been taken up adequately by the political class.

| by VENKITESH RAMAKRISHNAN and T.K. RAJALAKSHMI
Courtesy: Front Line India

( June 29, 2014, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) BOTH the contents of the Intelligence Bureau (I.B.) report on certain non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the manner in which the report was leaked in June underscored one important point: that this exercise was clearly part of a game plan devised by the Narendra Modi-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government. To start with, the report was leaked from the office of a chartered accountant-politician who is perceived to be rising fast in the new dispensation at the Centre. The politician’s office reportedly leaked the report on the premise that it was a first step towards unfolding some development thrusts of the new government. The 21-page document titled “Concerted efforts by select foreign-funded NGOs to ‘take down’ Indian development projects”, as the title suggests, seeks to selectively target certain NGOs and makes no secret of its intent.

The Narmada Bachao Andolan's "Jal-Satyagraha" at Bichoula village in Harda district of Madhya Pradesh, in September 2013. Photo:A.M. Faruqui
The very first paragraph of the report states as follows: “A significant number of Indian NGOs (funded by some donors based in the U.S., the U.K., Germany, the Netherlands and Scandinavian countries) have been noticed to be using people-centric issues to create an environment which lends itself to stalling development projects.” It goes on to specify the projects thus: “These include agitations against nuclear power plants, uranium mines, coal-fired power plants (CFPPs), genetically modified organisms (GMOs), mega industrial projects (Posco and Vedanta), hydel projects (at Narmada Sagar and in Arunachal Pradesh) and extractive industries (oil, limestone) in the north-east.” Thus making clear what and whose concerns were being addressed, the report concludes the paragraph with the estimation that “the negative impact on GDP [gross domestic product] growth is assessed to be 2-3 per cent per annum”.

The rest of the report details the activities of the alleged anti-national NGOs and some individuals who are apparently involved in their activities or are assisting them. The NGOs mentioned include Greenpeace, ActionAid, and The Alliance of Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA), and among the individuals are Suman Sahai, Vandana Shiva, Kavitha Kuruganti, S.P. Udayakumar, Aruna Rodrigues and Swami Agnivesh. Each NGO and the activities of each named individual are dealt with at some length and there is an evident effort to build a case against them.


The orchestration behind the report has also been unravelled by the manner in which it has plagiarised a speech made by Modi in New Delhi on September 9, 2006. Modi, who was then Gujarat Chief Minister, had pointed to a “vicious cycle” operating among NGOs. The speech has been recorded thus: “Another conspiracy—a vicious cycle is set up. Funds are obtained from abroad; an NGO is set up; a few articles are commissioned; a PR [public relations] firm is recruited and, slowly, with the help of the media, an image is created. And then awards are procured from foreign countries to enhance this image. Such a vicious cycle, a network of finance-activity-award is set up and, once they have secured an award, no one in Hindustan dares raise a finger, no matter how many the failings of the awardee.”

The I.B. report paraphrases this as follows: “A small group of activists and NGOs at times have succeeded in shaping policy debates in India. Apart from that, in some cases it is observed that in a cyclical process, an NGO is set up, funds are obtained from abroad, a few articles are commissioned, a PR firm is recruited and, slowly, with the help of the media an image is created. And then awards are procured from foreign countries to enhance the image, after which government machinery finds it more difficult to act against the awardee.”

Calculated moves

Commenting on the form and content of the report as well as the manner in which it has been propagated, the Patna-based political analyst Surendra Kishore told Frontline that this seemed like a unique political exercise that harked back to the style of functioning seen during the prime ministership of Indira Gandhi.

He said: “The craft one sees in the report is non pareil. It seeks to strike many birds with one stone. It has struck a blow for the so-called development projects mentioned. It has raised questions about foreign funding to NGOs but done that selectively, leaving out the ones that favour and help the BJP as well as the larger Sangh Parivar. I am of the view that this will now lead to two pursuits. First, a resolute move to implement these projects, some of which have been questioned and put on hold by the higher judiciary itself. This will essentially involve moves to advance the neoliberal development agenda while questioning the agit-prop positions and the championing of those causes taken up by these NGOs. The second aspect will also lead to calculated moves to initiate legal and punitive measures against some of these NGOs. The fact that the funding that many of them receive is questionable will certainly provide ammunition for the interested sections of the Modi government. In any case, one will not see the end of this debate anytime soon.”


It does not require phenomenal logic to infer as to who will benefit from the so-called development perspective highlighted in the I.B. report and the prospective drive based on it. In India, the plans of multinational corporations such as Vedanta, Posco and Monsanto have faced resistance not only from mass movements but also from the judiciary. Their projects involve massive displacement of people, especially indigenous tribal communities, in various parts of India. ASHA pointed to the corporate tilt in the I.B. report and expressed concern over its consequences for the people. ASHA said the report was silent on American multinationals such as Monsanto which spent vast resources on publicity work. It said an informed public debate on Bt brinjal helped put the introduction of the transgenic brinjal variety on hold. ASHA added that the moratorium on the release of Bt brinjal should be welcomed, especially since the Parliamentary Standing Committee (set up by the previous government) was unanimous in upholding it, and that the insinuation that the committee could be influenced by liaising and facilitation of articles was an insult to the credible body. The I.B. report, ASHA said, was not about foreign-funded NGOs but about quelling dissent and opposition. Anti-genetically modified seeds activists pointed out that the BJP’s election manifestoes in 2009 and 2014 had stated that “no genetically modified seed will be allowed for cultivation without full scientific data on long-term effects on soil, production and biological impact on consumers”.

Kudal Commission

Kishore pointed out that Indira Gandhi had initiated the Kudal Commission of Inquiry against NGOs. “This comparison imparts a kind of historical significance to the present report and the related actions that would emanate from it. In many ways, it necessitates and facilitates a recount of the NGO-civil society involvement in the Indian political and developmental space,” he said.

The Kudal Commission, headed by Purushottam Das Kudal, was set up in 1982 immediately after Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980. (In 1977, the Janata Party, a party formed by leaders who had opposed the Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi in 1975, received a huge mandate to form the first non-Congress government at the Centre.) The premise for setting up the commission was that a number of NGOs in the country were funded and controlled by the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and that they were trying to destabilise India. Political observers and civil society activists had then maintained that Indira Gandhi was irked by the political role played by NGOs in the anti-Emergency movement between 1975 and 1977. Several NGOs, especially Gandhian institutions such as the Gandhi Peace Foundation, had campaigned against the Emergency and facilitated the political mobilisation which helped end the Emergency in 1977. The Kudal Commission report is still not available comprehensively, but indications are that it did uphold Indira Gandhi’s premise that the CIA was involved with many major opposition forces and leaders during that period. Names mentioned in this connection include a number of Sangh Parivar associates and leaders of the socialist movement.


The context of the Kudal Commission inquiry and some of its perceived findings had raised a number of questions about the functioning of Indian NGOs. Allegations about foreign funding, CIA connection, and bureaucratisation of NGOs increased during this period, leading to a loss of intensity of their social and political involvement. It was perceived that the Indira Gandhi government had stifled the capacity of NGOs to bring together people on social and political issues.

A detailed study undertaken by Prakash Karat, general secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), on NGOs advanced this debate considerably. His study “Action Groups/Voluntary Organisations: A Factor in Imperialist Strategy”, argued that a number of NGOs reflected strategies developed in imperialist quarters to harness the forces of voluntary agencies/action groups to their strategic design to penetrate Indian society and influence its course of development. Even as arguments like this were discussed through most of the 1980s, in the early 1990s, several NGOs and civil society organisations started displaying a unique two-dimensional character.

On the one side, some of them became part of the social capital-oriented government processes while others took up social, political and people’s causes left unaddressed by established political players. While the difference between the two groups were noticeable during the Congress- and the BJP-led governments that were in power during the 1990s, the UPA-I government (2004-09) witnessed the involvement of the latter group in governance, through the National Advisory Council led by Congress president Sonia Gandhi.

This turn of events invited an organised reaction from the BJP at that time. It evolved two comprehensive vision documents that sought to emphasise the need to strengthen its own NGOs and harness them politically. This was advanced in a steadfast manner by supporting, building and infiltrating several NGOs and civil society organisations. The high point of this was during the anti-corruption movement led by Anna Hazare. The plan to hijack that movement for the political benefit of the BJP did advance well until Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) formed by him took the movement in a different direction. By any yardstick, the current report and the prospective and planned political and administrative moves on its basis are a continuation of this tussle. Clearly, the Modi government is targeting those NGOs that have sought to champion people’s causes not taken up adequately by the political class. An important instrument for these NGOs and civil society organisations and leaders to challenge this devious move would be enhancing their transparency and internal democracy quotient.

According to Sangh Parivar insiders, the RSS and its affiliates plan to create a climate where their front organisations and the NGOs controlled by them have hegemony over the social and political spaces now occupied by the NGOs that have taken up people-oriented issues. No wonder, the I.B. report is silent on a number of foreign-funded Sangh Parivar NGOs, whose questionable funding and activities have been cited time and again in the past two decades.

Clearly, the emergent situation and the orchestrations aimed at hegemony in civil society space make the role of NGOs and civil society organisations in the public sphere even more important.