Where can we take the 13th Amendment?


| by Victor Cherubim 

( October 26, 2012, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) Someone derisively said: “We can carry it with us in our suitcases when we go to India.” Yes, we can!  But how many times do we want to visit India. Can we take it with us to America or China, or for that matter, is anyone now concerned with our 13 Amendment? It is consigned to history.


The clarion call of the people heard even as far away as England is that they are not happy with the working of the 13th amendment. You don’t need a soothsayer to say this to the President.
They say the only advantage of a written constitution is that we can add and minus amendments at will and pleasure, if only we have a commanding two thirds majority in Parliament. The people have only afforded this prerogative selectively in our recent history, to use with wise judgment and not at random. In has to be appreciated, in an unwritten constitution, custom and practice, centuries of history determine what can be done and what is done.  

President Mahinda Rajapaksa was given such a mandate by the people of our land, by choice, hardly through default. The country felt after a long drawn out acrimonious war, we needed a voice which will overshadow all voices; we needed a leader who would be able to stand up to any pressure politics. We wanted for once and for all, that justice to be done not only to the Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim peoples of our land, but to achieve this, without any future bloodshed in our time. It is by no means any easy task, rather an enviable position.

Leaders around the world today, (name any country you wish) are being swayed by the vagaries of the times, by the economic, social, technological and political turbulence. Many are already jettisoned to history. Everywhere, we see the flotsam and jetsam of strategies and policies of governments.

It is small wonder why we in Sri Lanka, are able to continue to be battered by the winds of change and still maintain an even keel. Our President flies here flies there, even at the expense of travel in a seat in an aircraft without AC., with many critics complaining that all these trips are joy rides.

I was invited to the Abu Dhabi Investment Forum at London’s Lancaster Gate some days ago, the only Sri Lankan officially invited for this event. The theme was attracting investment to Abu Dhabi. I wanted to do what little I could do to export a little of this investment, from Abu Dhabi to Sri Lanka. It is not only the President who has to sell Sri Lanka abroad.

I challenge some of the critics to do the schedule of tours of President Rajapaksa, be ready to present a budget soon, be fit for serving the people and simultaneously being in constant touch with “ground realities” in the nooks and corners of our land as well as hear the voice of the people all of the time.

The clarion call of the people heard even as far away as England is that they are not happy with the working of the 13th amendment. You don’t need a soothsayer to say this to the President.

Why is the 13th Amendment such an eyesore?

In the first and solo place it is not Sri Lankan. It is an appendage thrust on us by foreign powers for their own national interest.

In the second place our national interest at present does not coincide with this anachronism. Times and many tides have changed. The world wants us to be tied to this bondage.

Thirdly, neither the Tamil people nor the Sinhala people of our land are happy with this administrative mechanism which is not fit for purpose.

What can be done?

I dare not tell our President and our people what can and should be done. Though I am a Sri Lankan, living in England, I am best at promoting Sri Lankan interests in England.

But I know many Sri Lankans who came to England, are also of my view, although some of them have taken naturalisation, but their mind and heart is in Sri Lanka. They know and I know, when the time is ready, not only auspiciously, that what is right for our Constitution will happen.

We await that to happen.