An area of much
concern for the country
| by Lt-Gen
Harwant Singh (retd)
( October 26,
2012, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) Of late, suicides in the military have
been highlighted by the national Press, and the issue also came up for
discussion in Parliament. The yearly average of suicides in the Indian Army is
around 100. Some may argue that in an army of 1.2 million, that figure is not
alarming. For the military, the life of every soldier is valuable and needs to
be protected. There are some very complex reasons for these suicides and it is
not possible to compartmentalise these into any set pattern or causes.
The officer whom
I relieved on the divisional staff had a bright career and had been cleared for
promotion to the rank of a brigadier. A day after handing over charge to me, he
shot himself. He had realised that the medical board would block his promotion.
The Deputy Commander of a brigade shot himself because some female had intruded
into his married life. A soldier’s wife in my unit, for no apparent reason,
suffered from fits of depression and the psychologist could not help her. She
took her own life. In each of these cases, their depression had taken them to a
point of no return, and the cause in each case was vastly different.
The Indian
soldier’s woes have increased manifold. A number of wars and low-intensity
operations in Sri Lanka and Kargil, and combating unending insurgencies have
been his bane. The death of a close friend in these operations led to
depression in some cases. Added to these are the repeated postings to high
altitude and uncongenial areas, where one experiences persistent feeling of
isolation and loneliness, and is haunted by possible sickness and the
impossibility of air evacuation due to persistent bad weather in such areas.
Postings in peace stations are burdened with overwork with little rest.
A soldier
throughout his service, at best, gets no more than two years to live with his
family. The break-up of the joint family system has left separated families to
fend for themselves. Problems of living alone, raising children, their
education and all the connected problems which get transmitted to the husband
via the mobile phone, on an almost daily basis, add to the soldier’s anxieties
and stresses. The Indian Army soldier is haunted by the prospect of retirement
at an early age of 35/37 years, and the consequent financial problems
thereafter. So, by and large, a soldier’s life in the Indian Army is stressful
and often depressing.
Units with high
standards of discipline, good morale and esprit de corps, with good and caring
officers, are less likely to face suicide cases. Good leadership coupled with
feelings by each soldier that he forms a useful member of the unit and his
efforts are recognised and appreciated reduce the chances of depression among
soldiers, who could otherwise be more susceptible to this malady. Efficient
administration in the unit such as timely grant of leave, ensuring that
soldiers get their rightful emoluments and periodic enhancement of their
professional skills add to their well-being and contentment. All this reduces
stress and anxiety which could be precursors to depression.
Some units adopt
a system of early detection of cases of stress and anxiety through the “buddy
system” and arrange counselling. As an immediate help at the unit level, a
certain number of Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs) are given basic training
in counselling.
The incidence of
suicides in the American army is one a day and the percentage of officers in
these cases has been higher than in India. The Pentagon sets aside $2 billion
for mental health of troops, and the authorities have been trying hard to
combat the problem of suicides. General Peter Chiarelli, who recently retired
as Deputy Chief of American army, feels that these funds are inadequate.
Suicide prevention programmes in the US army do not appear to make much
headway. In the American army, there are cases of officers, including some
doctors, ending their life though they never served in Iraq and Afghanistan,
and had a bright career, happy married life with bright children and no visible
scars.
Such is the
complexity and, perhaps, paradox of the working of the human mind and its
susceptibility to depression and consequent suicides. The state of helplessness
in combating this problem is best expressed by Leon Panetta, US Secretary of
Defence, in these words, “This issue of suicides is perhaps the most
frustrating challenge that I have come across.”
On the other
hand, India’s Defence Minister seems to have found a simplistic remedy in
liberal leave and good living conditions for soldiers. He has asked the Defence
Secretary and the three Vice-Chiefs of the services to go into the issue of
suicides. Predictably, this could be followed by constituting a “Group of
Secretaries”, (the government’s ultimate solution for any complicated issue) to
go into the issue and put up recommendations. This could possibly point to
creating a “Department of Prevention of Suicides in the Military”, with an IAS
officer as its full-time secretary! But these are perfunctory steps which have
become a norm with the government.
Years ago the
recruitment pattern was changed. The vacancies filled from the traditional
classes who had been providing manpower for the army were shifted to the
overall population spread in the country, and the recruitment came to be based
on recruitable male population of a province. It may be valuable to determine
if this recruitment pattern had added to the suicide cases. It is only a
detailed analysis of personal data that a workable solution can be evolved. It
is a problem that the army cannot just shoot it down or run a tank over it!
It would be
pertinent to look into the enrolment standards. Military service has been
rendered so unattractive that, for the present, it is the last choice for those
who seek government employment. Military service is not just another avenue for
employment for the unemployed. It is a well-acknowledged fact that soldiering
is not everyone’s cup of tea. It may be worthwhile to introduce some elementary
psychological tests for those seeking to join the military service as soldiers.
Comprehensive tests on these lines are already conducted by the Services
Selection Boards for those seeking entry into the officer cadre.
The writer is a
former Deputy Chief of Army Staff, Government of India