Govt. navigates judicial challenge


( October 7, 2012, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Throughout the last week, the government has been successfully navigating a judicial challenge issued vis-à-vis the Divineguma Bill. The government machinery had been working overtime to pass the disputed bill in provincial councils as per the Supreme Court ruling. By the end of the week, the bill has been passed by eight out of nine provincial councils. At the Cabinet meeting, the president also turned down a proposition made by Minister S.B. Dissanayake that the Bill be presented in Parliament as an urgent bill, thereby circumventing the time and space granted for the standard judicial review process.

On Tuesday, the Eastern Provincial Council passed the bill with a majority of six votes. It was initially thought that the passage of the bill in the EPC was to be a contentious affair, which could gauge the ruling UPFA’s grip in the provincial council.  Sources within the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress, the ruling UPFA’s partner in the EPC, confided that the SLMC provincial councillors had been instructed not to support the Bill until the green light was received from the SLMC’s top echelons. However, councillors reneged, highlighting a brewing internal strife within the SLMC. Twenty one members from UPFA, SLMC and Wimal Weerawansa’s JNP voted for the Bill while 15 members - from the UNP and the TNA opposed it.

On Tuesday, the bill was also passed in the Central Provincial Council by a majority of 19 votes.
However, there had been a hiccup in the Southern Provincial Council, which concluded its sessions, last month. The Southern Provincial Council was scheduled to be reconvened on October 9.  However, the government appeared to be in a rush. Southern Province Chief Minister Shan Wijayalal de Silva later met the Governor Kumari Balasuriya to request that she summons a special session.

Later, the Bill was also passed in the Southern Provincial Council by a majority of 21 votes at a special session held on October 2.  The Bill was also passed at the Sabaragamuwa Provincial Council by a majority of 15 votes. Twenty seven voted for the Bill, while 12 councillors opposed it.

Internal rivalry

In the North Central Provincial Council, which has been beset by an internal rivalry  between the former chief minister Berty Premalal Dissanayake and the incumbent S.M. Ranjith, the Bill was presented to the council in the absence of Berty Premalal Dissanayake, who has sent to the Council his leave application, ostensibly, as a display of his bitterness. Earlier, he openly vowed not to cooperate with his successor. He seems to have really meant what he said. Early last week, he sprung a surprise (though, he denied his involvement in defeating the ruling party’s nominee for the chairmanship).

Early last week, the ruling party in the NCP was taken by surprise when the party’s nominee for the chairmanship of the council lost to another UPFA member nominated by the opposition, highlighting the simmering internal rivalry.  During the secret vote, T.M.R. Siripala, nominated by the opposition UNP obtained 21 votes against 10 votes obtained by Amarakeerthi Athukorala nominated by the UPFA. The vote was viewed as a show of force by belligerent Berty Premalal Dissanayake who sat in the council as a backbencher when the council met for its inaugural session.

However, Berty Premalal, a feudal lord from rural Anuradhapura is unlikely to challenge the status quo in Colombo. The government, mindful of Berty’s limitations, is hardly bothered by his act of defiance.

Separation of  power

However, a hangover from the humiliation suffered by the statement issued by the Judiciary Service Commission remains with the government. The president who attended a district development committee meeting in Ratnapura on Friday took a swipe at the Judiciary. “The Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary are not to undermine each other. They should work in unison to strengthen the supremacy of the people,” the president said.

That is exactly the very notion of separation of  power principle. Unfortunately, the 18th Amendment has distorted that status quo, surrendering the supremacy of the people to the whims and fancies of the Executive. – Lakbima News