Changing cricket culture


| by N.S.Venkataraman

( October 4, 2012, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) I have been a cricket enthusiast  from my younger days and  in my college days I have played cricket in the college (not for the college).   I have been watching  cricket for the last  five decades with undiminished enthusiasm  and I do not know whether this sustained enthusiasm has been  due to my not maturing with the age!

Photograph by Michael Daub
I clearly see a  big change in the cricket culture over the last five decades , which people of my age (67 years) will  perhaps  understand.

In the olden days when a batsman would score a century , the captain and senior cricketers in the fielding side would go to the batsman and congratulate him by shaking hands.  We do not see such gestures nowadays.  Only the other batsman in the field congratulate him.

I remember a test match between India and Australia at Madras, when Indian team was led by G.S.Ramchand and Australian team was led by Richie Benaud.  Milka Singh , the young cricketer from Madras came into the field to bat and hit the first ball he faced with a glorious boundary.  Richie Benuad  applauded his shot spontaneously  and thus elevated the cricket culture to a lofty level.

The batsman walking out  when he would know that he was out, instead of waiting for the umpire's decision was a very common occurrence and I have seen batsman even informing the umpire that he was out and quietly walk away if the umpire would hesitate to give him out.

When a batsman would get out these days , we see ferocious celebration amongst the players of the fielding side with each one hugging other , patting each other everywhere in the body and almost making the batsman who got out feel that he was being driven out of the field.  Obviously, the batsman would walk away feeling humiliated ,with some members of the fielding side sometimes making even unpleasant gestures.  This was never the case in the earlier days. Someone seeing cricket for the first time , particularly the matches such as T 20 ,  would wonder as to whether cricket is a game or a warfare.

We have seen great captains like Nawab of Pataudi of India and Richie Benaud of Australia who were looked upon as “father figures” by the other members of the team.. Once somebody would become a captain, he would never play under any body’s captaincy later on in those days. Pataudi and Benaud after becoming captain did not play under anyone else.  Today, the captain’s job looks like one of rotation and therefore , it is no more associated with the prestige that it once  commanded.

I have seen in fifties and sixties that when a batsman would perform very well or a member of the fielding side would perform very well, all others would request the particular person to lead them when they would return back to the pavilion.  We rarely see such gestures these days.

Obviously , the cricket culture has changed and time alone would prove whether it would be for good or bad.