| by
Nalin de Silva
(
September 26, 2012, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Divineguma bill should have
opened the eyes of not only the government MPs but also of the others. The
Supreme Court has decided that the Provincial Councils should approve the Bill
before it is presented to Parliament. Some may argue that power would be concentrated
in the hands of one individual if the bill becomes law. However, if there had
been no Thirteenth Amendment, the Bill would not have been inconsistent with
the Constitution.
The
Divineguma Bill, even if it seeks to vest a single individual with more powers,
it is not an arbitrary person who would use the powers but a cabinet minister
under whose purview the particular Department or the Ministry would have been
established. With a change of government, if not before that under a cabinet
reshuffle a different individual would be in charge of the Divineguma project
and it is clear that as long as the Thirteenth Amendment is there it poses a
threat to Parliamentary democracy which has been there for more than sixty
years in the country. It may be that we do not have the ideal parliamentary
democracy in this country, but then which country has such an ideal system?
The
Thirteenth Amendment as we all know was imposed on us by India in a very
unparliamentarily way. The government MPs were transported to the Parliament in
buses from a hotel in Colombo and the SLFP and several other parties opposed
it. The then Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi himself was involved in that
process with Dixit riding roughshod over the elected President and the
Parliament of this country. If not for India that trained the terrorists and
supported them, there would not have been a Thirteenth Amendment. India and
England together with other countries acted in unison to undermine the powers
of Sri Lankan Parliament. It was nothing but diplomatic terrorism of Dixit. The
bomb he used was the Thirteenth Amendment.
There
should be no place for the Thirteenth Amendment in the country’s basis law, as
it was enacted to solve a problem that was created by the English. We were told
that there was an ethnic problem that had to be solved peacefully through
negotiations, and India guided by Tamil Nadu joined the West in opposing any
operations by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces to eradicate the scourge of
terrorism. Various peace organisations were founded with western money and they
echoed the views of their masters and mistresses. The peace bandwagon
propagated the myth that the LTTE could not be defeated and that Prabhakaran
was on par with some of the well known westerners.
The
west, India and their paid servants in the peace brigade wanted to base their
solution to the so-called ethnic problem on the Thirteenth Amendment and tried
to sabotage operations by Armed Forces against the terrorists using even
bankrupt ideas such as the Buddhists should not engage in war.
Now
that the LTTE has been defeated, there is no reason why the Thirteenth
Amendment should be part of the Constitution. The government should have taken
steps to abolish it soon after the LTTE terrorists were defeated three years
ago. All that needs to be done even at this later stage is to bring a
Nineteenth Amendment to abolish the Thirteenth Amendment.
It is
heartening to note that the new Chief Minister of the Eastern Province has said
that Thirteenth Amendment serves no purpose and the Provincial Councils are
white elephants or words to that effect. Keeping that amendment is not
different from keeping the Katunayaka and Trincomalee bases after the
"independence". As long as those bases were kept under the English
there was no independence of any sort, and the Thirteenth Amendment imposed on
us by India with the connivance of the West using terrorist methods only
restricts our independence as seen by the fate that befell the Divineguma Bill.
It is
clear that with the current constitution of the Provincial Councils it would be
not difficult for the President to get the Provincial Councils and the Governor
of the Northern Province to approve that Bill. However, it should not be done
as it would give legitimacy to the unwanted Thirteenth Amendment and undermine
the powers of Parliament, which should be the only legislature in the country.
The
Supreme Court has given a ruling interpreting the existing law and it is up to
the legislature to change the Constitution. There is no point in discussing
Thirteen Plus or even Thirteen Minus as it is clear that even the people in the
Northern and the Eastern Provinces are not benefited by the thirteenth
amendment.
Divineguma
would have been for the entire country including those two provinces and
because of the Thirteenth Amendment the people in the Eastern and the Northern
Provinces have been denied what they should have obtained as developmental
measures. It is time for the members of the UPFA to get rid of this obnoxious
piece of legislation imposed on us by India with the connivance of the western
countries.