| by Dirgha Raj Prasai
( August 28, 2012, Kathmandu, Sri Lanka Guardian) No one will keep on tolerating if limits of injustice are crossed. It is well said- 'If you try to beat up a cat confined within four walls it will attack your neck.' Nepali Congress, UML and especially, the Maoists in name of Loktantra (Indian democracy) have betrayed Nepali people, which have created similar circumstances involving the cat. Some treacherous leaders have come under the influence of the foreigners by accepting their money provided in sufficient amount, and dared to kick this holy land. They are supporting the foreign agendas that include ‘Christianization’ of Nepal through establishment of secular state, and disintegration through republic and federalism. They will not feel any shame if this nation drowns. They (especially, Maoist, Congress, UML leaders) have trapped Nepali people and institutionalized inflation, insecurity, murder, kidnapping, theft, rape, anarchy and so on.
No one is secure in Nepal. But these leaders think they are protected by foreigners. They always speak by rehearsing anti-nationalist agendas. They know that secularism will invite terrorism; republic disintegration, and federalism is the foundation of feudal rule. Some leaders of Nepali Congress, UML and Maoist are still advocating these agendas. The political activists inside the parties and free Nepali people have been annoyed by the leaders of the so-called big parties that are bent on drowning Nepal. There are majority number of nationalists in the Maoist party, UML and Nepali Congress. In Madhesi parties there are many patriots except the existing leaders. However, people of Terai are aware of the fact that the leaders inside the Madhesi parties are Indian’s agents; most of them are paid agents. They are also aware that they are creating rift among Terai people. The patriotic Nepali people, regardless of where they live, are now alert to fight against such traitors. For how long can this injustice meted out by the traitors be tolerated?
Time has changed its course. Yesterday, India contrived various schemes to capture Nepal. Nepali Congress leader Girija Prasad Koirala was irked when King Gyanendra did not hand over the government to him after 2001. Girija assured government leadership to UML leader Madhav Nepal, Maoists’ leaders Prachanda and Baburam Bhattarai and drew them into the uprising, and subsequently into signing the 12 -point agreement in Delhi-2005, as designed by RAW. The Maoists had fought against the corrupt rule of the Congress and UML, but later ended up joining their hands. What can be more shameful and degenerating issue in politics than this? The Indian anti-Nepal leaders understood that it could not keep Nepal under its control until the monarchy existed.
Then, India had been conspiring since 24 April, 2006 when the political parties reached consensus with the King, and subsequently betrayed him against the aspirations of the Nepali people. The leaders of the uprising were ready to support the Indian intelligence wing. On 18 May these leaders under the influence of Indian direction took a decision to discontinue the royal institution, and declared Nepal a secular nation. It was the direction of the Indian intelligence wing ‘RAW’ that sowed the seeds of conspiracy based on the belief that it would be easier to disintegrate the people and sideline the King after the declaration of secularism. Secularism will only affect negatively the illiterate people, enticing them away from their religious with the futile hope of economic benefits. Then, inter-religious conflict will begin, also affecting the stability of neighboring countries. With the break in the existing harmonious terms between the religious sects many followers of Christian and some Muslim religion would obviously support secularism. Foreign and national Christians gave monetary incentive to the ethnic groups as Sherpa, Tamang and some Muslim that eat beef, and urged them to support secularism against the interest of Hindu and Buddhist religious sects. What a conspiracy?
As the Nepali saying goes- 'Even when one utters the name of the actual criminal or murderer unfortunately that person is caught on basis of the notion if he is the culprit.' (Hatyara Aparadhi ko Nam Linda Matra Pani, Pakru Parcha Nirdoshi Dos Yesko Chha Bhani.') Like the gist of the poem written by the great poet Bhawabhuti when one openly speaks of the traitors one risks inviting blames upon one’s own head. It is crime to talk of saving Nepal and keeping Nepal’s identity intact. Nepal faces darkness in the day. All lies have turned into truths and all truths into lies.
Since 2006 the media fraternity has not scrupled to publish even trash if it were spoken by some 25/30 traitors and 7/10 civil society activists. The journalists do not care what lies are spoken by these people. Media has played an important role in transforming daylight into darkness. May be the journalists are forced to write such things spoken by those who have eaten foreigners’ food for fear of losing their jobs. Down with such traitors and bastards! The situation has been molded into such a frame. No matter how rightly we nationalists’ speak our pleas go unheard. What can be worst than such a nature of betray to the nation?
This is how the history of American intervention started in Nepal. The King would have naturally lent his support to the Hindu nation. So, after the declaration of secular state America openly supported the Indian design. America was aware of the fact that when the King was removed the people remained silent. Now America wants to use Nepal as a base to support Free Tibet movement against China’s interest. The capitalist nations decided that it will be easy to convert Nepal into a Christian state. Then Britain including other European nations has also lent their support to republic and secular system in Nepal. How easy it was for Congress, UML and the Maoists to declare secularism, republic and federalism with the foreign support without the consent of more than 90 % population? King Gyanendra had no other alternative than to accept the desire of the world power and leave Narayanhiti palace.
Political character is nothing compared to foreign stance and money. Our leaders have also taught the world how to deceive the nation by accepting the foreign fund. Let alone the issue of drafting a new constitution these leaders are eager to declare republic, secularism and federalism. Can they deny traditional power excluding the King and majority people. The political parties betrayed the king in RAW's design with was against the natural justice.
What kind of constitution will be made? How can we move ahead? It is anticipated that the so-called constitution will be fired in the whole country. There should be discussion to find ways to save Nepal’s identity and prestige. Before we move ahead with any declaration we must firstly take the vote of confidence of the people. What the party leaders have done than rob the nation, promote extensive corruption, kill the people, kick the dignity of the nation and end the existence of the sovereign Nepal? One day the people will punish such culprit so-called leaders. Is there any nation that has not punished such traitors?
Nepal had not faced such situation before. Foreigners are manipulating the party leaders, which has resulted in decisions that favor them. China in view of these activities is preparing to enter Nepal with necessary resources and tools. We fear if Nepal will turn into a battle ground in the ensuing tussle between India, China and America. In the end Nepali people will be trapped in the height of injustice due to these selfishly driven acts of foreign brokers and foreigners. The patriotic King Gyanendra in awareness of this fact gave a heart-touching statement on the occasion of his birthday on 7 July- last year. The King’s statement made the foreign agents inside political parties and outside agitated. They have started to use a threatening tone- 'The king should not speak such things.'
What the King confidently spoke in front of the journalists on 7, July is as follows: 'More than five years after the declaration on 24 April, 2006 I have not found that my sacrifice and my magnanimity has been fruitful among the people. It is my inner desire that Nepali people should carve the future and fate of Nepal and Nepalese people. However, in the past five years the aspirations of dignified Nepali and his respective ancestors has not taken a complete shape. I had not left the throne in anticipation of such a situation. At the time when I had left the throne I had not believed that such a situation would arise. I have love for an independent Nepal. Regardless of my status I will remain committed to Nepal’s independence and integrity.'
The King should have had said that he left the throne in compulsion to avoid bloodshed after being deceived by the naïve leaders moving under foreigners’ direction. It is true that the declaration of republic has not any legal grounding. But the King did not want to say this. People call King Gyanendra dictatorial, but we don’t find any such traits in him. He does not want people to suffer. Like the agenda in Mahabharata- ‘Ashoksthama Hatohat’, national and international conspirators had turned King Gyanendra into a dictatorial figure, but now it has all been proved wrong.
Now only the reinstatement of King Gyanendra will make possible the process of bringing the chaotic situation into an ordered track. King Gyanendra is well aware of the situation of the nation, and has experience of how to handle it. One happy side of the matter is that King Gyanendra does not have any prejudice against anyone. He has the capability of uniting all sides. All the political parties must accept King Gyanendra’s nationalist pledge. The political parties and those outside it should accept the 1990 Constitution, and under the mediation of King Gyanendra, a new cabinet should be formed to give solution to the nation.
Nepali Congress leader Prakash Koirala (B.P’s eldest son) had given his opinion in the People’s Review weekly on 7 July 2012- 'As the Nepali people understand that the royal institution is a matchless source of sovereignty, unity, peace and security they will bring it back. There will not be any new constitution. There is no alternative to reviving the 1990 Constitution and saving the nation.' The Constituent Assembly and its Interim constitution is dead simultaneously. So, it is necessary to implement for the sake of country's stability. It is our common desire that we reach an agreement to form a new democratic system along with the King, and hold the parliamentary election after which the elected parliament and the subsequent cabinet must rid the nation of corruption and foreign intervention and this holy land will be saved. . So, there is no alternative except to impliment the Constitution of Nepal 1990 to save the country.
 No one will keep on tolerating if limits of injustice are crossed...){kind=link}
Post a Comment