Their language is violence and when violence is reciprocated they understand it clearly, The message was clean and clear.
(August 08, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) In 1958, that was 50 years ago and two generations before when the first violence was unleashed against innocent Tamils in Sri Lanka, we Tamils said the same thing you people said when they got assaulted in South India, Do I see anything wrong in it?. This is merely the beginning. If you think what happened in 1958 is wrong and if you will admit it now, yes I will say it is wrong. Am I a bad guy? Yes. if "tit for tat" is only way to make people realize what have they done is wrong, then I am perfectly right. what does justice seek, equitable retribution, that is `tit for tat`. See how we mobilized 70 million Tamils worldwide against injustice. It is time to put Mahanayake and Mahinda on trial. I am not Gothabaya to hang them. It is time for the Singhalese people to turn around 180 degrees and walk a different path. The path of Racism and Fanaticism will only take you into the dungeon. My entire life was spent on living with and fighting against Racism, Fanaticism and State terrorism. That is why I am such an ardent and devoted Racist, because I was made into one. Born clean, brought up dirty!
What the world must come to know is, we Tamil suffered and are suffering for the last 60 years and no one asked why. That is why the criminals got away with crimes against humanity. So what we did, we mobilised 70 million Tamils world wide and are reciprocating what they did to us. Do you mean to say the I am wrong. In that case Sir Winston Churchill was wrong too for going after the Nazis. It is reverse evolution; born as man but went back to animal. It is possible and is proved.
It not a war against people, it is against a mindset of primitiveness, cunningness, timidity, ignorance, stupidity and illiteracy. The animal has to contained, quarantined, sanitized and salvaged from its bestiality.
Let me quote from Jean Jacques Rousseau, in making a pact to live in a civil society, we tacitly understand and accept that we respect peace, freedom and right to make living as universal covenant and in any event any one to the person break that scared covenant we regain our natural freedom where might is right and the strong over weak prevails. What the Singhalese did in Sri Lanka was to break that scared pact and for fifty years they kept breaking it. Right to life is not sovereign presumption, it is beyond national borders and presumptions. Because it is irretrievable there are no laws to kill people, even if one has killed another. Sri Lanka never respected this scared law of the creator. Even killing one person is a major international crime.claiming sovereignity and immunity are just knave talk.
In this spectrum of morality where is Sri Lanka? It is in par with Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan etc. Why would the world politicize killing life. Will I get way with murder if I can proof that it is politically correct. It cannot be.
So then what is the world waiting for or we stopped awaiting for and we do what they did to us. If that is the only language they will understand and if it is the expeditious way to resolve our issue, lets do it back to them what they did to us.
That is exactly what is happening to visiting Singhalese in South India, That will send stroing maeesage to Sri Lanka, India and the United Nations that they have act fast. i woulkd suggest the law enforcemen in India must do eaxtly what the law enforcement is Sri Lanka does. And Sonya Ghandi must do eaxtly what Mahinda Rajapksa does. We have to take is moral degradation to the grassroot level in Sri Lanka, so that they will begin to change
Am I right is asying this, nto at all, but then what is right? What is good for is what is right. Right and wrondf was invented by man living in civil society. In Sri Lanka there is no civil society, so what is right is what is good for me.
Bring on your intellectuals and experst and let talk about what is right.
When Gothabaya Rajapaksa talks do see any right in his talking. NO
When (G)reat (L)iar Peiris talks do you see any right in his talking. NO
They stand by what is good for them as the right, therefore we have to stand by what is good for us.
Post a Comment