What did blunders- UNMIN in Nepal-2007-2010?

Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal (C), also known as Prachanda, gestures as he arrives at parliament in Kathmandu on February 2, 2011, to file for candidacy for the prime minister's election slated for the following day. Nepal's parliament is holding first round of voting February 3 for a Prime Minister under new election rules designed to break a deadlock that has left the country without a government for seven months. - Getty Image

by Dirgha Raj Prasai

(February 03, Kathmandu, Sri Lanka Guardian) From the very beginning, Nepal is respectfully following the objectives of UN. May be the UN, as an organization, is working for peace in Nepal. As we all know that, the main objective of UNMIN was to establish peace in Nepal, but in the contrary "The Team of Representatives-UNMIN" who had found exercising against the peace process in Nepal. We were totally puzzled, whether UNMIN was here to establish peace or confuse people. UNMIN could not understand the reality. They had instigated civil war in Nepal. UNMIN could not manage the systematic peaceful points with the Maoist.

Nepalese people had expected that the UN's role would be impartial. But the UN could not remain neutral. The UNMIN listens only to the Maoist rebels and the corrupt leaders of the so-called big party totally disregarded the aspiration of majority of the Nepalese people. From the very beginning, UNMIN became active to demoralize the Nepal Army and only supported the Maoist's interest and its rebel by allowing them to keep the weapons with them in the cantonment. UNMIN joined the hands with Maoist for secularism, republish and federalism without condition. To keep National Army inside the barrack, does it indicate the establishment of peace as he tried to present the Maoist militia at par with the National Army?

We, Nepalese nationalists never forget the bad intention of UNMIN. Four years ago UNMIN's military chief Jan Erik Wilhelson damaged the neutral role of the UN and propping up the rebel forces. Does it indicate his neutral role and his effort to establish peace in the country when he participated in the function or even become the guest of honors accepting salute from the Maoist rebels at the function organized by the Maoists on the day they attacked the Nepal Army's barrack, killed so many army men and looted weapons.

The Maoist leader Mr. Baburam Bhattarai had disclosed the reality and the intention of UNMIN- 'After the abolition of the monarchy, would try to resist, and our main contradiction then would be with the bourgeois democratic parties. After April 2009 [when Prachanda resigned from government], that phase of the Constituent Assembly and implementation of the bourgeois democratic republic was more or less complete. We had formulated the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), we had our base areas, we had a lot of mass support, and all this we have been able to preserve. The PLA is still with us, and the arms we collected during that war are still with us within the single-key system, monitored by the United Nations team, but basically the key is with us and the army is with us and we have never surrendered. We are still continuing in the path of revolution.' Was that peace assignment of UNMIN in Nepal? It is a most questionable point why the UNMIN kept the National Army inside the barrack? Can we compare the Maoist militia at par with the National Army?

We have found so many conspirator evidences in Nepal that the International forces- UNMIN, OHCHAR, CIA and European nations have been a contriving to muster economic resources amounting to billions for Christianity in Nepal. It has been written (Gorkhapatra 11 April 2010) that many international non government organizations are spending 10 to 15 billion yearly to alter Nepal’s identity by edifying its religion and culture by Christianity. They know-Nepal is the pious Hindu country in the lapse of the Himalayas, which is beautiful, quiet, the birth place of Buddha and origin of Hinduism. Lord Buddha is believed to be the incarnation of Lord Vishnu- the Hindu God. Besides being the country of Everest it is equally popular with its diverse cultural values. This is the land where civilization began and is also known as the country of 'SANGRILA.' Nepal is as holy place to Hindus & Buddhists, as Mecca for Muslims and Jerusalem to Jews and Christians.

Since 2006-the foreigners had and have adopted a new agenda for succeeding these works. They have analyzed that the shortest way to achieve their goals is to influence the Bhramins-90% and none Bramins only10 % of the political parties and the NGOs here. They have understood that investing on various ethnic people and Dalits or non-Bhramins is not as much influential as it is by investing on the Bhramins. Secularism and a republic were declared with the activities of Bhramin leaders. Secularism and republic were not the demands of the Nepalese. The agendas of RAW & CIA was declared overnight in an uncustomary way by using five to seven traitors by treading over constitutionalism.

In such situation, The Maoist leader Prachanda, who opposes imperialist character, amidst a mass meeting of Christians at the Open Theater on 20 April 2010, said 'Those who oppose secularism will be kidnapped.' is it not the backing by Christians Missions ? (Rajdhani, 21 April 2010). Clapping will not even be heard from the Christians in such an assemblage, unless profits are made by Maoists and foreigners. Is it not the backing by Christian's missions, CIA & RAW? This is the design of the foreigners where the UNMIN and now OHCHAR had and have been representing everyone. This is why it is our demand that UNMIN has already returned and OHCHAR also should be chased away as soon as possible.

The great blunder of UNMIN was to ask the government for not recruiting new personnel in the Nepal army and also not providing lethal arms to the Nepal army, a national security force. Nowhere in the world, would a country be able to protect its sovereignty by making the national army weak and powerless? The national army can't compare with Maoist's army. Now, in Nepal, now, we have two kinds of army- the national army and the Maoist's army. Can we imagine two kinds of army in a country? Why UNMIN was not responsible for the overall management and supervision of Maoist army and their movement?

Now, we understood the intention of UN and its Org. UNMIN including Indian intelligence wing- RAW is to destroy all the identities of Hindus & Buddhists with the help of Maoist's army. The UNMIN had exceeded its limit and the mandate/jurisdiction awarded to this UN body and had also been found engaged in playing politics. In such condition, we are feeling, the Virus of UNMIN was more dangerous than Swine flu.

Yes, the cause of the crisis in Nepal was not only UNMIN but also the culprit party leader's betrayals. They (Maoist, Congress and UML) deceived the agreement with the King- 24th April 2006. And then they, themselves, invited the Indian, UNMIN CIA and other foreigner's interventions.

The world knows, Nepal is positioned between two big nations-China and India. Nepal is close to India in terms of culture and geography, but Nepal has always been victimized by some Indian Congress (I) leaders and RAW. But China never insults the aspirations of the Nepalese people and sovereignty. Nepal is a sovereign country, Nepalese army is free to do anything for the country. Nepalese people don't tolerate foreign intervention to our domestic affairs. In order to protect the sovereignty, democracy and identity of Nepal, Nepal needs a permanent institution-the monarchy who shoulders the responsibility for its independence, national unity and sovereignty. The King had no role in bringing this sorry state of this country. Nepalese monarchy is the most convincing identity of Nepal's independence and its sovereignty. To save Nepal, there should be monarchical-democratic system. And then, there should be maintained co-ordination and balance among nationality, monarchy and parliamentary democracy.

(The writer can be reached at dirgharajprasai@gmail.com )