Why India is supporting the Nepalese Maoist?

by Dirgha Raj Prasai

(September 03, Kathmandu, Sri Lanka Guardian) Nepal and India do not want any kind of communist authoritarianism, they aspiring only full democracy. The concerns of the both country is political stability, peace and good governance. It is because only a good and well-established political system can lead the public mass by determining appropriate social and economic management of the state through concrete policies and programmers. So, the both nations are interested for democratic system. But, the Maoists of Nepal and India want the any democratic government to step down; to be replaced by one led by themselves. Then why the Indian politicians and diplomats are supporting the anarchist groups?

Since 2006, Nepal has been known as the party of opportunists and destructors. After general election- 1990, Girija Prasad became Prime Minister. He came out aggressive in spreading the influence of Congress in every organ of the politics and administration by finishing off opposition. The current violence, murder, theft, rape and insecurity started from 1991. The creator of Maoist rebellion was Girija. After 1992 in name of annihilating Masal-Communists (later who called the Maoists) the murder, suppression, rape was not much it crossed the limit. In revenge, Maoist systematically killed thousands of civilians, police and army personnel. Millions worth physical infrastructure was destroyed or burned. And then, since 2005, Girija-leader of NC joined the hands with the Maoist. JNU Prof -S.D.Muni, the strategist of RAW had given the 12-point anti-Nepal agendas- of Republic, Secularism and Federal states to the perverted leaders of the parties and a few lawyers, doctors, journalists to end the existence of Nepal.

The Maoists are using their agendas and are opening a ‘Pandora’s Box’- one-party communist anarchism. The Maoist Party has their own army. The UNMIN also listened only to the Maoist rebels and the corrupt leaders of the so-called big party. The UNMIN and other unseen groups are working to push Nepal into a bloodier civil war and conflict. From the very beginning, UNMIN has been demoralizing the Nepal army.


Nowhere in the world, would a country be able to protect its sovereignty by making the national army weak and powerless? Can we compare the national army with the Maoists cadre (army)? Due to the suspicious activities UNMIN, now, in Nepal, we have two kinds of army- the national army and the Maoist's army. Can we imagine two kinds of army in a country?

If we can understand the grand design of Maoist, the Maoist leader Baburam Bhattarai says- ‘After the abolition of the monarchy, would try to resist, and our main contradiction then would be with the bourgeois democratic parties. After April 2009 [when Prachanda resigned from government], that phase of the Constituent Assembly and implementation of the bourgeois democratic republic was more or less complete. We had formulated the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), we had our base areas, we had a lot of mass support, and all this we have been able to preserve. The PLA is still with us, and the arms we collected during that war are still with us within the single-key system, monitored by the United Nations team, but basically the key is with us and the army is with us and we have never surrendered. We are still continuing in the path of revolution.' http://www.wprmbritain.org/?p=926>5th Nov. 2009
World People's Resistance Movement (Britain) The reality of the grand design of Maoist's has exposed from Dr. Bhattarai.

I am sorry to write that it was a great blunder of Indian diplomats- Shyam Saran- former Indian ambassador and former foreign Secretary of India, who is widely credited with bringing the present instability in Nepal and Sive Shankar Mukharejee-former foreign minister, KB Rajan- former Indian ambassador, Rakesh Sood-present ambassador, Prof.SD Muni and other officials who not only blundered in their assessment of Maoist but also did much harm to Indian’s interests in Nepal. Among the diplomats, Shyam Saran is a very ambitious diplomat who could not calculate the good result. Now, the Nepalese Maoists, RIM and COMPOSA have been joining the hands for one-party Communism.

Due to the blunder of the culprit Nepalese leaders and the Indian diplomats, nationality and democracy of the both country is in danger position. I think, due to the Indian Maoist (Naksalite) Indian security force is becoming weak day by day. In such condition, what is the answer of Indian politicians and diplomats? The Nepalese and Indian people's position is in danger. Without analyzing the assumption, why the Indian leaders supported the Nepalese Maoist’s hypocrisy? ‘Crows are never the white for washing.’

An Indian scholar Dr. Arvind Gupta writes- Anti-India feeling in Nepal is at its peak. The peace process in Nepal is extremely complicated. India helped bring about the 12-point agreement. It is doubtful that India can help bring the peace process to the desired outcome. There is no guarantee that the Constitution will be drafted soon and that even if drafted, it will bring stability. Nepalese are suspicious of India when they hear Indians talk about cooperation on water issues. Many in Nepal feel that mega projects will not help Nepal. The unregulated, open India-Nepal border is a major security concern for both countries. Cross-border crime, smuggling, fake currency and infiltration of undesirable elements including potential terrorists into India are a major security concern. Nepal also has concerns regarding the smuggling of small arms from the Indian side into Nepal.' August 27, 2010 'INDIA NEEDS A NEW PARADIGM IN ITS NEPAL POLICY

A prominent journalist Pushpa Raj Pradhan, editor-People's Review, writes- 'Indian Embassy in Kathmandu is spending 57 billion rupees per years under the ' Small Grant Project'. Out of total FM radios, 50 percent of them are receiving such Indians grants. Similarly, some Christian missions have also funded those FM radios just to broadcast Christian programmed. India wants the Indianization of Nepal and the Christians want to transform Nepal from a Hindu state to a Christian state. A famous researcher, Yogi Narahari Nath always used to say that Nepal is giving everything to India, from its fresh air to herbs, fresh water, indigenous production working manpower, etc and Nepal is getting nothing from India. The Indian wish is to bring all the political parties in the Indian fold. The Indian mission was fulfilled by the seven parties plus Maoists alliance with the direct support of India-from human resources to financial resources. Christians too became successful to declare Nepal a secular state.'-5 Aug.2010. It is a matter of grief that the political leaders are not feeling the naked foreign intervention.' So, it is very necessary that all the nationalists including King should stand to save the identity and sovereignty of this pious land- NEPAL.

What were pitfalls of the Constitution of 1990? Why was it suspended without reason? What kind of new constitution we require? Why India supported the Constituent assembly? These are the causes of crisis in Nepal. The anti-Indian voice is increasing day-by-day. Nepalese democratic exercise faced the black period in between 2005-2010. The nation’s future seems dark because they have walked as directed by unseen force beckons without studying Nepal’s geographical reality and sensitivity.

In Nepal's context, for 240 years the Shah dynasty did not allow Nepal to disintegrate. Even in difficult situations, the dynasty preserved national dignity. The dynasty that never bowed down to foreign influence bowed down to the people. But the Nepalese people still have not recognized the true value of the institution. Nepalese monarchy has been always showing goodwill towards India. Cordial people to people level relations between Nepal and India has existed since ancient times. We have to keep friendly relations with India due to our similar cultural and religious traditions. But, since 2005, the cordial situation is humiliating day by day between Nepal & India. The permanent institution- 'Monarchy' can put unites the cordial relation between Nepal & India. So, Nepalese nationalists, India and all the democratic forces demand to reinstate the Nepalese beloved monarchy to save the identity, unity and democracy, according to the 1990 constitution, and form all party cabinet The king needs to form an inclusive cabinet under the leadership of neutral politician find a solution on that backing.