The diary of terror – 30th January 2010

Sealing of a newspaper

(January 31, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The premises at Delkanda, Nugegoda, of the Lanka newspaper published by the JVP was sealed off by a group of officers from the CID yesterday. The editor, Chandana Sirimalwatha, who has been arrested previously and is still in detention, was brought to the premises and the sealing off took place in his presence. All the employees were told to take any of their personal belongings and then forced to leave the premises. The JVP was one of the political parties of the joint opposition which participated in the last presidential elections as a coalition. Their common candidate was Gen. (Ret.) Sarath Fonseka, who the joint opposition claims has won the election, and has been deprived of the victory by fraudulence.

This newspaper is published in the Sinhala language and is known for its bias towards the poor and the marginalized groups in Sri Lanka. With the weakening of the one time powerful labour parties of Sri Lanka (the Lanka Samasamaja Party and the Sri Lanka Communist Party), the JVP emerged as the most popular leftist party in Sri Lanka, representing the workers and poorer sections of society. Twice in its history the JVP has been subjected to extreme forms of repression and literally tens of thousands of young people, mainly from the marginalized groups of Sri Lanka, have been killed in these repressions. The closure of the newspaper and the threat to the leader of the JVP, Somawansa Amarasinghe, by the Secretary of Defense a few days back may be a sign of another turn of repression against this political group.

The government is now preparing for the parliamentary elections, which are due in April this year. The closure of the newspaper is seen by the opposition as an attempt to weaken the JVP in the coming elections. The government’s declared aim is to acquire the votes of persons who have voted for the opposition during the presidential election for the government in the parliamentary elections. The closure of the Sinhala newspaper will contribute to the deprivation of information, especially to the marginalized groups, during the elections.

Disappearences

Pregeeth Ekanaliyagoda, who was abducted on the 24th of January, remains missing. For details, see the diary note yesterday. The causing of disappearances has been a marked feature of repression in Sri Lanka in recent decades. Previous elections in Sri Lanka have been accompanied by waves of disappearances, particularly at times when the ruling political group faces difficulties in the elections. The highest rates of disappearances in recent years was between 1988 and 1991 when the then ruling regime of President Premadasa was in serious crisis. The highest rates of disappearances were around the days of the elections. Disappearances are used to intimidate the political parties as well as the voters of the opposition. According to the Commissions on Forced Disappearances, a large number of disappearances during 1988 – 1991 were members of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, which was the main opposition party at the time. A feature of such disappearances was the exhibition of dead bodies in the roads and the rivers as a method of causing widespread fear. This method was called the Human Broiler Project.

In causing disappearances, intelligence services, the military, the military police and paramilitary groups have been used. Despite enormous numbers of disappearances on record from the south, north and east, the Sri Lankan government has consistently refused to become a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Forced Disappearances and to have disappearances declared as an offence. Despite the presence of significant evidence of causing disappearances against many security officers and politicians, subsequent governments have refused to prosecute the offenders.

A recent study (soon to be published) conducted by two independent experts into 880 cases of habeas corpus which have come before courts in Sri Lanka clearly demonstrates that the writ of habeas corpus has become a very ineffective legal remedy due to many defects of its implementation. Most cases have been dismissed by courts on very flimsy grounds. Thus, even in cases of disappearances, such as in the case of Pregeeth Ekanaliyagoda, there is hardly any legal remedy available for persons who face such problems.

Provocative use of media against opposition

The media continued to be used provocatively against dissent and against the joint opposition. Television channels and Government radio continued to air interviews with senior government officers who spoke about a plot hatched by the joint opposition candidate, Gen. (Ret.) Sarath Fonseka, to assassinate the president and his family. The denials by the General, who stated that it’s only stupid people who would make conspiracies to assassinate a president from a hotel near the president’s house, was not mentioned in the interviews aired by the Government channels.

The government propaganda on this matter is seen as an attempt to manipulate public opinion to create an impression of an attempt by the opposition to generate violence, with the view to justify government repression of the opposition. A raid was conducted into the office used by the opposition for the presidential election, and it was publicized as an attempt to find explosives kept on the premises. The opposition spokesman revealed that the raid was conducted without a warrant. About 200 officers participated in this raid. When asked about the legal basis for the raid without a warrant, the officer in charge of the raid stated to lawyers of the opposition that it was conducted under prevention of terrorism laws. The abuse of the prevention of terrorism laws to conduct raids relating to elections was clearly abuse of legal process. At the end of the raid, when questioned by the opposition, the raiders stated that they found nothing illegal kept in the premises. The sole purpose of the raid was to create a public impression against the opposition and its election candidate as being engaged in violence as a ploy to justify arrest and other acts of repression by the government itself.

The activities of repression have created an atmosphere of fear and terror and many persons who have participated in the political process during the election campaign fear that they will be targeted for arrest and other forms of repression at any time.

Possible repetition of the Naxalite Conspiracy of 1982

A report from the Sunday Times ( 31/01/2010)on the imminent arrest of Sarath Fonseka:

Alleged plot to kill President and overthrow government

The arrest of retired General Sarath Fonseka any time now became imminent yesterday as a team of Criminal Investigations Department (CID) detectives probed an alleged attempt to overthrow the Government and assassinate President Mahinda Rajapaksa. The Department of Immigration and Emigration has been instructed not to allow Gen. Fonseka, his son-in-law Danuna Tillekeratne and a few others including retired Army officers to leave Sri Lanka. Instructions have gone out to officials at the Bandaranaike International Airport where security has been beefed up with more Air Force personnel.(Read More)

A similar plot, popularly known as the Naxalite Conspiracy, was hatched by President JR Jayawardene in 1982 after the presidential election, alleging that Vijaya Kumaranatunge, a strong supporter of the opposition presidential candidate, as engaged in a conspiracy to assassinate president Jayawardene if the opposition won the presidential election. On this basis, Vijaya Kumaranatunge was arrested and kept in detention. It is known as a totally fabricated attempt to silence Vijaya Kumaranatunge during the referendum because of his support for the opposition.