By Thomas Johnpulle
(February 05, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) The naked reality of Indian federalism can be seen from Tamil Nadu. It is terrifying on one hand and kind of outlandish on the other. India has been a federal country. But unlike many other federal countries in the world, its federal boundaries run along racial lines. Nothing much has happened over the years in terms of colonisation of Tamil Nadu by non-Tamils. Over 95% of India’s Tamils still live in Tamil Nadu and over 95% of those who are living in Tamil Nadu are Tamils! There are many freedom struggles across India based on race. Development has done little or nothing to take away separatism.
However, India with its third largest army and the largest paramilitary force in the world has managed to keep separatists under check. When compared to the wealth of the LTTE, India’s separatist fighters are penniless. Tamil Nadu had its own separatist struggle before 1962. It failed owing to many reasons, most importantly thanks to anti-separatism legislation. But the flame of separation has not died. Their desire to be a separate nation is channelled to sympathy for the Tamil Elam struggle across the Palk Strait. At least two Tamils have committed suicide showing support to the ‘liberation struggle’ in Sri Lanka and at least two more have attempted it within the space of a few days.
Open Support for Tamil Elam and LTTE
Most Tamil Nadu political parties support Tamil Elam and the LTTE to various degrees. They have done their share to please the LTTE. This is exactly what will happen in Northern and Eastern parts of Sri Lanka if anything similar to Tamil Nadu is created without proper ethnic integration.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Muthuwel Karunanidhi played a number of antics until the Sri Lankan Army Commander’s comments brought him to his senses. Thirumavalavan also showed what he can do with a four day fast unto death! Vaiko used his eloquent nonsense to make his presence felt. These are the type of politicians Sri Lanka will have if a Tamil Nadu is created here.
Given the massive support for the Tamil Elam struggle from Tamil Nadu, one can only imagine the support a local Tamil Nadu will have for it. Therefore when a federal structure creates a Tamil Nadu equivalent in Sri Lanka, federations on both sides of the Palk Strait will be on fire demanding Tamil Elam in one voice.
Rulers of Sri Lanka should not be carried away by petty assurances given by their close associates who are either running regional administrations in the north-east at the moment or tipped to become administrators in the near future. The period of honeymoon won’t last long. Their camaraderie is only with the incumbent President and no sooner he leaves office, hell will break out.
The outcome of regional elections immediately following military victories cannot be considered representative of ground realities. But as time passes by, seeds of separatism will again germinate as before. They have almost a century-old divisive/racial political infrastructure to build on.
LTTE – a political affair
Nothing about the LTTE is a political affair in Central India. LTTE ban that was imposed in 1992 continued regardless of who was in power. However, in Sri Lanka the LTTE ban has been a political affair. It was imposed in 1998 by the PA government and within just months after UNP assumed office the ban was lifted in 2002 only to be reimposed by the UPFA government. Political parties made agreements with the LTTE in the lead up to crucial elections in 1989, 1994, 2001 and possibly 2004 and 2005. In simple words main political parties made alliances with the LTTE in all national elections after 1983. If this is the plight of the national political parties, the plight of regional political parties in the north-east will be much worse. They will have to please the remains of the LTTE, its still functioning overseas branches, its ancillary organisations in Canada, UK, Singapore, etc.
Eventually regional administrations in the north-east will become puppets of overseas LTTE branches.
It was reported that the Tamil Nadu police was after troublemakers who caused havoc in the name of supporting Tamil Elam. Police did a good job in quelling trouble. However, in Sri Lanka this will not happen. The police will be either under the regional administration or the central administration. Or it may be torn between the two! In any case the police will be serving its political masters. As a result if a Tamil Nadu equivalent is created in Sri Lanka, its police will be no more than legitimised rebels.
Racial politics
Race-based political parties only care about the people of its race; they don’t pay any attention to others. If a representative from another community is included in their party, he would be just a yesman. Examples are All Ceylon Tamil Congress, Singhala Maka Sabhai, Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi, Tamil United Liberation Front, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (registered in 1989), Tamil National Alliance, Muslim Congress, Sihala Urumaya, Hela Urumaya and Sinhalaye Maha Sammatha Boomiputhraya Party. In wide contrast national political parties are concerned about a wide section of the population irrespective of race.
When two race-based political parties compete with each other, the party that is seen as most racist wins because race is the main criteria and the reason for the parties’ existence. Unfortunately this is what happened in north-east politics ever since 1931. A gradual descend is seen from the ACTC to TNA. ACTC was with the 1947 elect government in most part of its existence. Its successor, ITAK, joined with the governing coalition for a shorter span of its existence. TULF and TNA were worse and showed no co-operation whatsoever and the latter being the worse of the two. As explained above this gradual descend into total tribalism is the outcome of competition between two or more race-based parties.
Without a doubt the northern region and the eastern region will be dominated by race-based parties in time to come when the heat of the military victory dies down. That was how these regions have always been! Then it will be much worse than all the above mentioned parties combined. Please note that none of the above mentioned parties had any instrument or establishment to govern at will. In a federal structure or reasonably autonomous structure, these parties will have a large territory and sufficient powers to play with. The outcome will be calamitous.
To make things worse they will influence the central government as well. Their support in forming a ruling coalition in parliament would be crucial and their co-operation would be on condition of support to their agendas. At Presidential elections, they can shut out the voters if they so desire altering the outcome. Like in Tamil Nadu they will flex the muscle to get what they want from the central government. Although the Indian central government, especially the Indian Prime Minister stood firm, Sri Lanka will never have politicians of that calibre!
Racial Federalism
The Northern Province is a Tamil only region after the LTTE succeeded in a double genocide by 1990. If a federal structure is created either along provincial boundaries or racial boundaries, it is ‘racial federalism’ we are talking about. This is not going to solve the ethnic problem. In fact it will only aggravate it by further isolating communities.
Culturally the Northern region will be with Tamil Nadu, not Sri Lanka; spiritually it will be with Tamil Nadu, not Sri Lanka; politically it will be with Tamil Nadu, not Sri Lanka (the sheer number of visits our northern politicians made to Tamil Nadu explains this); economically it will be torn between Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka (especially when thriving trade between the two ‘states’ recommences after the war). Clearly the Northern region will be in most part aligned with Tamil Nadu, India than Sri Lanka!
Is this what the people of Sri Lanka (irrespective of race) want? They have shown otherwise by vehemently rejecting federalism; even toned down versions. Governments had to risk their very existence trying to push these ‘solutions’. As the (political not racial) majority do not support them, they will never succeed on the ground. Forcing federalism (or toned downed versions) on the people under curfew, under siege from a foreign army, under threat of sanctions or any other compulsion will only make it worse.
Another big confusion is about ‘who needs a solution’; should it be Sri Lankans or Tamils? If it is Tamils, and not all Sri Lankans, then there is little justification for non-Tamils to agree on such a solution. It is as simple as that. When 20 million people are craving for solutions to their problems, only solving the problems of Tamils while the others are still hungry and craving, will lead to commotions, if not war.
As long as some proponents of ‘political’ solutions fail to grasp this reality, there cannot be a political solution which means either the parties must battle it out or live with it.
The Right Solution
The right solution should defeat racism, separatism and block the avenues of another potential uprising. As long as the North remains mono-ethnic, race-based politics will rule it as it did from 1931 to this date. This is the ideal breeding ground of racism, separatism and terrorism. In fact the north was the only place race-based politics thrived most. Most separatist leaders emerged from the North and without a doubt according to the Mahaveer listing of the LTTE, most fighters also came from the mono-ethnic North! This is no coincident.
The only way is to ethnically integrate the North as any other province. There is a huge added economic advantage too. There are hundreds of thousands of hectares of arable land and hundreds of kilometres of coastline that offers gainful employment to the farming and fishing communities that are crammed into an unsustainably small area at the moment. Once a thriving economy shared by Sinhalas, Tamils and Muslims is created in the north which in turn benefits the country, the country will be inseparably bound to the north and vice versa. It will also change the mono-ethnic North into a bubbling multiethnic community where race is no longer a political tool.
The North will be as diverse, colourful and beautiful as the National Flag leaving no room for separatism. How can separatists claim it as Tamil homeland (or part of it), if Tamils are only one part of its community?
As a by-product, it will also rubbish the Tamil homelands concept which stood in the way of ethnic integration for over 80 years.
However, the separate Tamil cultural and religious identities must be kept as they are. There is no justification for a dilution of the unique Tamil culture in the name of integration. Separate Tamil political aspirations would disappear in favour of national aspirations.-Sri Lanka Guardian
Home Unlabelled A Federal System Means a Tamil Nadu in Sri Lanka
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Tamil Nadu is Sri Lanka's neighbour and as the saying goes, you cannot choose and pick your neighbours. It is upto Sri Lankans to retain its independance and the cosmopolitan way of life which is widely different to Tamil nadu.
The cosmopolitan way of life has always been a pillar of strength for all Sri Lankans whether they live in the country or elsewhere.
Thank you for the TIMELY article.
Ethnic Integration as the author of this article, and I myself, advocate is the only true and permanent solution to preserving the integrity of Sri Lanka and harmony among all of its people for centuries to come.
Devolution of power to ethnic majorities centered in large provinces is a prescription for the eventual breakup of Sri Lanka. While devolution of power to ethnic regions in any form is a mortal danger to Sri Lanka, devolution under a federal system is far worse than devolution under a unitary system of government.
Any devolution of power to ethnic majorities with regional control of land use, security forces, courts, and economic development will deny the use of the resources in these sparsely populated regions of the North and East to all citizens of the country, irrespective of race. The enojyment of those resources, in common, is the ancestral birthright of all peoples of Sri Lanka, that may not be denied to them for any reason.
Ethnic integration that I advocate requires the government to adopt and pursue policies that would return the Sinhala, Muslim and Tamil people cleansed from these lands to their former homes, and would open additional crown lands in the North and East for settlement to all communities in proportion to the population statistics of the country as a whole, with the goal of achieving a uniform mix of ethnic populations across the entire country. The ultimate goal is to achieve a population with the same ethnic mix of people everywhere.
Currently, the great majority of Tamil people (85%) live outside the North and East among Sinhala people, but the growing populations of Sinhala and Moslem people have been denied access to the land and economic resources of their country in the North and East, discriminating against them.
At the root of the current conflict is the lack of contact and empathy between the various ethnic communities due to isolation from one another everywhere except in the major cities. By adopting policies that would promote increased contact to foster mutual understanding and empathy between the races, especially among children in their formative years, we would promote the emergence of a single Sri Lankan identity as one people living in one country as one nation.
In contrast, the devolution of power to ethnically constituted administrative regions within the framework of the country would only serve to permanently embed ethnic differences that would, in time, lead to renewed call for separation in the future. As the author of this article correctly points out, all driving forces, of both internal and external (Tamil Nadu) origin, are directed towards inexorably propelling Sri Lanka towards eventual disintegration, if power is devolved to large regions on an ethnic basis.
Proponents of Federalism point to India as a suitable model for Sri Lanka to emulate. India, constituted as a collection of ethnic states, is a disaster in the making. There are 13 major ethnic separatist and social-inequity driven insurgencies under way in India, and the success of the Indian model of government is very much in doubt. Tamil Nadu, may well be the first state to successfully break away from the Indian union, posing a mortal threat to Sri Lanka. Steps should be taken NOW to preclude any attempt to annex the North of East of Sri Lanka, through ethnic integration, as is proposed here.
False allegations of "intolerable discrimination," egged on and actively supported by Tamil Nadu and India, served as the pretext for certain segments of the Sri Lankan Tamil population to wage a conflict for a separate state. Let us now demolish that pretext by rigorously enforcing equal rights and equal responsibilities in one country inhabited by one Sri Lankan people through ETHNIC INTEGRATION, instead of setting the stage for the separatists to win in peace the mono-ethnic aparthied state of Eelam they sought to create in a futile war.
I commend the author for an excellent analysis that debunks conventional wisdom.
I would like to pay tribute for your stand on the ethnic problem. People who can look beyond their own race are the cream of humanity. I am in total agreement with you that whatever the solution might be it should lay a foundation for peaceful harmony among all Sri Lankan citizens.
I am quite happy for Sinhalese and Muslim people who were chased away from those areas to resettle but I am in doubt whether making large scale Sinhalese and Muslim settlement in the North is the right way to go. As a Sinhalese I do not want any more hurt to come to our people, Sinhalese or Tamil. My objection to a mass scale resettlement of people is another angle that we need to look at this problem since to find a proper solution we need to look from many different angles. Pluralism of sincere views can help here. Because of the suffering of the war I think both people are ready to contribute sincere views. If majority of us can think beyond racial boundaries and divisions then we can find a solution surpassing racial separatism or federalism. What we need is mostly a change of heart.
Monoethnic regions foster insular thinking and the ethnic integration of multiethnic encounter, wherein anyone is able to freely live anywhere on the island is the socially healthy path to nation rebuilding. Obviously, the Muslim and Sinhala people who have been expelled from Jaffna by the LTTE must return to their homes for starters. As development projects start up, the other ethnic groups will be interested in living in these regions as well. Obviously, anyone living in the region will have to learn at lest conversational Tamil, just as much as the millions of Tamils who have moved to live in the South have had to learn Sinhalese in order to communicate with other people and lead socially healthy lives. Just as the South has welcomed and been hospitable to the people from the North, the North must show the same hospitality as they had always done up until these problems were fostered and aggravated by the violence of the LTTE. Sri Lanka as a whole is an open minded society, and it is in only in Jaffna and Vanni that the LTTE ethos has held the strongest sway. Just as during the tsunami, the help given by the Sinhalese to the affected Tamil people was accepted with grace, even though it was short-lived due to LTTE interference, there is no doubt that over time, bridges of friendship will overcome the mistrust that has reigned these last decades. Sri Lankans are yearning to live as they once did, in peace and harmony.
Post a Comment