Climate change is perhaps the greatest threat to food security. If we fail to place combating climate change at the very top of our food security agenda, we will be seriously neglecting our responsibility. Our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will help us in the long term, but not immediately. In the meantime, adaptation to climate change is paramount.
_________________
by Erik Solheim
(June 05, Rome, Sri Lanka Guardian) I would like to begin by thanking FAO for convening this meeting, and the Secretary-General for upgrading the meeting to a summit to address the global food crisis.
In some ways, the world is now a victim of its own success. Economic growth in
many developing economies is perhaps the most important factor behind
increased food prices. Millions can finally afford to eat better, and this provides
a welcome opportunity for individual farmers as well as economic growth in
many countries. We should not lose sight of this.
However, this is not much comfort to those who can no longer afford their daily
bread.
As we have seen over the past few months, the increased risk of hunger means
an increased risk of violence, crime and social unrest. Political instability and
even the breakdown of governments could follow.
We must act now to prevent such situations from arising. I would in particular
urge the UN and other actors in post-conflict situations to take a comprehensive
approach, where security, mediation and support to political processes are
integrated with humanitarian assistance and longer-term development measures.
We must prevent the food crisis from adding to the burden of fragile postconflict
states and pushing them back into conflict. We must do everything we
can to prevent the millions lifted out of poverty over the last couple of decades
from sliding back into misery. We must target our actions at the most needy –
often those suffering in silence – not the vocal middle class.
In our eagerness to act quickly, we must make sure that actions taken now do
not have negative consequences in the long term. For example, when we
distribute fertilizer and seed as part of our response, no concessions can be made
to proper analysis. Each intervention must be put in a larger context. FAO has,
for instance, drawn up excellent guidelines for seed aid. We must make sure
they are used.
I welcome the timely leadership shown by Kofi Annan in launching the Alliance
for a Green Revolution in Africa. Increased productivity is clearly required to
meet the needs of a growing global population. Particularly in Africa, which has
not enjoyed the increase in productivity seen in other parts of the world.
But increased productivity is of little value to the African farmer if she cannot
get her products to a functional market. Part of the answer to the crisis is to be
found in the traditional development toolbox: infrastructure, improved
governance and conducive economic policies.
In our efforts to increase production, we must not back down on our principles
of environmental sustainability. These efforts must not lead to loss of genetic
resources for food and agriculture, including minor crops of importance for food
security, and they must not cause pollution or depletion of scarce water
resources. Land tenure and property rights are another critical issue.
I regret having to repeat yet again that women are the backbone of agriculture in
the developing world. We will not succeed unless everything we do takes this
into account.
The private sector has to be a driver for agricultural development. We have to
think outside the box in order to attract responsible private sector engagement. I
firmly believe in encouraging and facilitating public-private partnerships.
Ten days ago I visited drought-stricken areas of Australia. The drought has
taken a devastating toll. We have spent too much time discussing what the
consequences of future climate change may be. Go to Australia and see for
yourself. Climate change is taking place here and now, and it has to be dealt
with.
Climate change is perhaps the greatest threat to food security. If we fail to place
combating climate change at the very top of our food security agenda, we will
be seriously neglecting our responsibility. Our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions will help us in the long term, but not immediately. In the meantime,
adaptation to climate change is paramount.
Production of biofuels has turned into a controversial issue in the debate on
climate change. I don’t think the issue is about yes or no to biofuels. I think it is
about doing things the right way - to maximize the positive contributions of
biofuels and minimize their possible negative effects, including for food prices.
But the criteria for how to do this in a sustainable manner are yet to be
developed. As also alluded to by the Minister of Agriculture of the People’s
Republic of China yesterday, we believe that we need to initiate an
intergovernmental UN process to develop a set of agreed principles and criteria
for sustainable production and use of biofuels.
In this context, I note with interest the proposal of Prime Minister Zapatero of
Spain for a follow-up to this meeting to agree on further concrete measures. At
such an occasion, we would benefit from the final proposal for a Comprehensive
Framework for Action being developed by the High-level Task Force on the
Global Food Crisis, as well as other initiatives to develop concrete response
measures.
Before closing, I would like to briefly reflect on the fact that we are gathered
here in Rome to address food security and hunger. Regrettably, this is not the
first time. World leaders were gathered here 34 years ago with the same issue on
the agenda. Let me quote from the final paragraph of the declaration adopted
back then:
“Time is short. Urgent and sustained action is vital.”
This time around, we do not have another 34 years at our disposal. Somehow, we have to break the circle now.
(The statement resealed by the Norwegian Minister of the Environment and International Developments, Erich Solheim at the High-Level Conference on World Food Security: the Challenges of Climate Change and Bioenergy Rome, 3-5 June 2008)
- Sri Lanka Guardian
Home Unlabelled “Time is short. Urgent and sustained action is vital.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Eric for Gods sake read the following article and see at least now you can choose right from wrong. This was not written by a so called "Sinhala Buddhist Racist". I
sincerely hope you and your country men's have enough brain to understand this, or am I expecting too much from you guys.
Sympathy for the Devil Sat, 2008-06-07 02:07 By Stephen Long, Los Angeles
Yesterday’s heartless bomb blast aboard a public bus carrying students in Moratuwa reminded me of that Rolling Stones anthem of the early 70’s: “Sympathy for the Devil.”
“Please allow me to introduce myself
I’m a man of wealth and taste.
I’ve been around for a long, long years
Stole many a man’s soul and faith.
And I was ‘round when Jesus Christ
Had his moment of doubt and pain
Made damn sure that Pilate
Washed his hands and sealed his fate.
I rode a tank
Held a general’s rank
When the blitzkrieg raged
And the bodies stank.
I watched with glee
While your kings and queens
Fought for ten decades
For the gods they made.
Pleased to meet you
Hope you guessed my name, oh yeah
And what’s puzzling you
Is the nature of my game, oh yeah.
Thank you, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards for those timeless and insightful lyrics about the consummate evil megalomaniac. Have you guessed who these lyrics refer to these days? Of course: the devil himself, Mr. V. Prabhakaran, the leader of those merry cadres up north in Sri Lanka who’s “Stole many a man’s soul and faith.” Prabhakaran, the man who “washes his hands and seals the fate” of the innocent lives he destroys on a whim. The same man, Prabhakaran, who seems willing to “fight for ten decades,” and hold the “general’s rank” while “the bodies stank” in the streets of Colombo. We know “the nature of your game,” Prabhakaran; we’re not puzzled at all.
What really gets me is how could there possibly be anyone alive on the planet that would still have sympathy for a notorious devil like Prabhakaran, leader of the LTTE murder cult. After that senseless wasting of human lives in Moratua, what did it gain him? What was the purpose, other than to demonstrate his twisted will? Doesn’t everyone see that his perverted ego is the motivating force behind the killings; his ego and the delusional vision he has of himself at the helm of an independent Tamil state in Sri Lanka? How can anyone still support him and his cause after yet this latest senseless act of cold-blooded murder?
And yet, there are many around the world who Do support Prabhakaran and the LTTE. Why? Their media machine is strong, and their public relations mechanisms have loud, resounding, powerful voices. They have managed to convince many groups of people in influential positions, in important international organizations, that they are underdog freedom fighters – deserving of the public’s sympathy. Their media and lobbying efforts have seemingly won over honorable men like Jimmy Carter and Desmond Tutu. They’ve even managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the United Nations.
They have many weapons in their arsenal in addition to those hideous Claymore bombs. Their media and public relations weapons are the ones they are using most skillfully. They’ve even hired a mercenary of former high repute to be captain of their campaign:
Bruce Fein, a former US Deputy Attorney General; he’s now their highly-paid ($100,000 a month) mouthpiece in Washington D.C. Last year LTTE operatives were even caught trying to bribe US State Department Officials. What’s next? They’ll do anything to promote their “image” as the downtrodden, stepped-on, discriminated-against people of Sri Lanka. But is killing countless numbers of innocent people (don’t forget, he kills innocent Tamils, too) really the warranted punishment for ancient sins that should have been resolved and forgotten centuries ago?
Wake up, people. Whatever ills may have been committed against Sri Lankan Tamils in the past are nothing compared to the murder of innocent students and pregnant women – whose unborn babies will never see the light of day.
Don’t be fooled by the Devil – and don’t have sympathy for him either!
Get real! Sympathy for Prabhakaran is nothing more than blatant ignorance. It’s time this demented ogre was permanently retired – and I’m looking forward to the day when they don’t give him a gold watch, but a prison cell as his reward.
Post a Comment