Arise, Citizen Journalist!

(The world’s best known writer of science fiction, Sir Arthur C. Clarke has published over 100 books, and over a thousand essays and short stories. One of his short stories inspired the World Wide Web. Sir Arthur thanks Nalaka Gunawardene for his support in writing this essay originally published in 2005. He has pass away today early morning at his residence in Colombo)

The 2004 tsunami, amid its mayhem, gave birth to a new breed of journalists

_______________________________

by Sir Arthur C. Clarke

(March 19, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The Asian tsunami of 2004 has been described as an event that literally shook the world. In years to come, we might also look back at this catastrophic event as a defining moment for information and communication technologies, especially the mass media. Living close to the scene of devastation in Sri Lanka, I witnessed these processes first hand.

That day, dozens of holiday-makers captured horrifying images of the tsunami using their ‘handycam’ video cameras, making it probably the most widely filmed natural disaster in history. They just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time—yet decided to keep their cameras rolling. TV networks and professional journalists arrived at the scene hours later—and had to ‘borrow’ amateur footage to tell the story.

Even after hordes of journalists and camera crews had reached the disaster’s multiple locations, concerned ordinary people offered first-hand narratives and personal perspectives to a world anxiously following the unfolding humanitarian crisis. Relief workers, volunteers and other public-spirited individuals turned to the internet and offered their own personal web logs. These ‘blogs’ developed a wide following among those who wanted a counterpoint to the fleeting coverage—or helicopter journalism—that was coming out in much of the mainstream media.

Even though these were triumphs of information and communications technologies (ICT) in such circumstances, let’s not get carried away too much. The tsunami also reminded us how vulnerable our information society is. When electricity and telephones—both fixed and mobile—failed in the worst affected areas, it was a century-old technology that came to the rescue: amateur radio enthusiasts restored the first communication links with the outside world, sometimes using Morse code to save power on the car batteries they tapped. Courageous and resourceful radio hams were at the forefront of relief efforts in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in India, Hambantota in Sri Lanka and other locations. We may never know how many lives they saved or how many minds they put at ease, but we owe a debt to Marconi’s faithful followers. As the president of the Radio Society of Sri Lanka remarked, "When all else is dead, short wave is alive."

Beyond Expectations

Talking about the future of media—and journalism—at a time of rapid change can be foolhardy, if not outright hazardous. Even if we outline the limits of the possible, it is difficult to guess when these developments might take place. For example, when I proposed the idea of a geostationary communications satellite 60 years ago (in Wireless World, October 1945), I imagined it would be done in a few decades. It took only two. We, as a species, have a deep urge to communicate—so if something is technologically feasible, we will pursue it sooner rather than later. Virtually everything we wish to do in the field of communications is now technologically possible. The only limitations are financial, legal or political. In time, I am sure, most of these will also disappear—leaving us with only limitations imposed by our own morality. How we shape the networked world of the future lies entirely in our hands.

And that’s an awesome responsibility—one that we have not exercised very well in the last century. For example, we have long known the power of television to educate, inform, entertain and even inspire. However, this is not immediately self-evident when we surf the bewildering array of channels now available—much of television, indeed, deserves to be called the ‘Great Wasteland’. But I am not impressed by the attacks on television because of the truly dreadful programmes that it sometimes carries.I believe that every TV programme has some educational content: the cathode ray tube is a window to the world—indeed, to many worlds. Often it may be a very murky window, but I’ve slowly come to the conclusion that, on balance, even bad TV is preferable to no TV at all.

End of an era?

So let’s agree on some bottomlines here. Whether we like it or not, we live in a media-driven world: if all the presses in the world stopped rolling and the airwaves suddenly fell silent, the world as we know it will cease to exist. The various forms of mass media are necessary to create a well-informed, empowered society—but they are no longer sufficient.

The American writer A.J. Leibling once said, "Freedom of the press belongs to those who own one." This was very much the case—until recently. In theory, at least, the internet now enables everyone who owns a computer to have her own ‘printing press’ and ‘broadcast station’.

Historically, organised and commercialised mass media have existed only in the past five centuries, since the first newspapers—as we know them—emerged in Europe. Before the printing press was invented, all news was local and there were few gatekeepers controlling its flow. Having evolved highly centralised systems of media for half a millennium, we are now returning to a second era of mass media—in the true sense of that term. Blogs, wikis and citizen journalism are all signs of things to come.

This has far-reaching implications. For one thing, it allows far higher levels of interactivity and audience engagement than has been possible in newspapers, radio or television. Even more importantly, the web provides a platform for small-time companies, organisations and single individuals to disseminate ideas, analyses and viewpoints to a potentially global audience. And it can be done at a fraction of the cost of launching mainstream media outlets. While the web is not yet a level playing field and has its own limitations, it has already triggered the end of absolute power enjoyed by press barons and gatekeeper editors.

Nowhere is this breach more apparent than in the remarkably swift rise of bloggers. Their publishing of online diaries has shown how passionate individuals can command attention and influence way beyond their professional or social circles. John Naughton, a noted British chronicler of the new media, says the web has again demonstrated its capacity to unleash disruptive innovation on a complacent establishment. As he wrote in 2003, "The response of the ‘professional’ media to this explosion has been interesting. First there was patronising incredulity that people would write without being paid for it. Then there was disdain. ‘Where’, asked the hacks, ‘was the quality control?’ Surely the whole thing was just an epidemic of vanity publishing. Then there was unease, fuelled by the realisation that (a) large numbers of bloggers were talking to one another behind the media’s back, as it were, and (b) some of them knew more about many subjects than most journalists. Badly researched or ideologically skewed reporting was being instantly skewered by bloggers...."

Naughton has documented many instances where poor journalism about highly technical or complicated issues was exposed by bloggers. The Columbia space shuttle disaster was one, where half-baked journalistic theories were effortlessly demolished by bloggers with serious aerospace expertise.

The blogging community has refused to accept the news ‘agenda’ as determined by the mainstream media. As Naughton says, "This has been increasingly evident since 9/11 as the established US media have dumbed down their discussion of the issues surrounding security, civil liberties and Bush’s policy towards Iraq.It would not be much of an exaggeration to say that (with a few honourable exceptions) most of the serious discussion of these issues in the US at the moment is happening in weblogs and not in the ‘official’ mass media."

It’s too soon to tell how much and how far bloggers could act as a countervailing force for the lapses and excesses in the mainstream media not just in the US, but across the world. We can only hope that the bloggers will push the mainstream to embrace long overdue reforms to become more transparent and accountable—the very virtues that editorialists constantly preach to the world’s governments and corporations.

An open moment

The new era of citizen journalism—inspired by the proliferation of ICTs—is only just beginning. It represents an open moment for free flow of information and good journalism: if we seize the moment, it can help us to reclaim the public interest that has been sidelined or forgotten by most sections of commercialised media.

In We Media: How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information, Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis define citizen journalism as the act of citizens "playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analysing and disseminating news and information". As they say, "The intent of this participation is to provide independent, reliable, accurate, wide-ranging and relevant information that a democracy requires."

These are the qualities that we expect—and once took for granted—in the mainstream media. But as my friend and former cbs news anchor Walter Cronkite commented about the US media, assorted pressures have increased in recent years, threatening the fabric of editorial integrity and independence. He adds: "Corporate censorship is just as dangerous as government censorship...and self-censorship can be the most insidious form of pulling punches. Pressures to go along, to get along, or to place the needs of advertisers or companies above the public’s need for reliable information distort a free press and threaten democracy itself."

There is no guarantee, of course, that citizen journalism will be free of biases. But as the wiki—another new tool of the web—has proved, the simultaneous participation of many can be a good self-correcting mechanism. For example, there were initial fears that the Wikipedia—the free, online encyclopaedia developed by thousands of contributors worldwide—might peddle half-truths or untruths. Studies have shown how accuracy and moderation are quickly restored even when an occasional extremist entry is attempted.

But will citizen journalism survive and thrive in the harsh marketplace? The answer to that question lies in our hands—let us not underestimate the power of the discerning media consumer to set new trends (and not forget how mass indifference kills many innovations).

A demonstration that it is indeed possible to do—engage in good citizen journalism and still do well commercially—comes from South Korea, the most highly-networked country. Five years ago, journalist Oh Yeon-Ho started a web paper called OhmyNews (www.ohmynews.com). His philosophy was simple: "Every Citizen is a Reporter." It now has a staff of some 40 traditional reporters and editors—but they write only about one fifth of its content. The rest is generated by thousands of freelance contributors, most of them with no formal journalistic training.

As newspaper circulation dropped by a third since 2000, OhmyNews has emerged as one of the most influential news and information sites in South Korea—with more than 7,50,000 unique users per day. It is also transforming the country’s conservative political environment. The site was widely credited with influencing the election of President Roh Moo-hyun; he gave his first post-election interview to OhmyNews.The protest rallies that came with Roh’s impeachment trial were covered in great detail—through text, photography and video—by dozens of citizen reporters.

Developments like these can no longer be dismissed as curious experiments and press barons are taking note. Addressing the American Society of Newspaper Editors in New York earlier this year, Rupert Murdoch acknowledged the challenge his industry now faces. He said: "Like many of you in this room, I’m a digital immigrant. I wasn’t weaned on the web, nor coddled on a computer. Instead, I grew up in a highly centralised world where news and information were tightly controlled by a few editors, who deemed to tell us what we could and should know. My two young daughters, on the other hand, will be digital natives. They’ll never know a world without ubiquitous broadband internet access."

There is more than just a generation gap that separates the mainstream media from the increasingly influential online media. It will be interesting to see how Rupert repositions his News Corporation to meet these realities. Meanwhile, let us not write off the mainstream media—it has survived and adapted to many changes in both technology and the marketplace.

Yet one thing is clear: the age of passive media consumption is fast drawing to an end. There will be no turning back on the road from Citizen Kane to citizen journalist.

Biography

The achievements of Arthur C. Clarke, unique among his peers, bridge the arts and sciences. His works and his authorship have ranged from scientific discovery to science fiction, from technical application to entertainment, and have made a global impact on the lives of present and future generations.

Arthur C. Clarke is the son of an English farming family, born in the seaside town of Minehead, Somerset, England on December 16, 1917. In 1998, his lifetime work was recognized by H.M. The Queen when he was honored with a Knighthood – formally conferred by Prince Charles in Sri Lanka two years later.

After attending schools in his home county, Arthur Clarke moved to London in 1936 and pursued his early interest in space sciences by joining the British Interplanetary Society. He started to contribute to the BIS Bulletin and began to write science fiction.

As with so many young men at the time, World War II interrupted in 1939 and he joined the RAF, eventually becoming an officer in charge of the first radar talk-down equipment, the Ground Controlled Approach, during its experimental trials. Later, his only non-science-fiction novel, Glide Path, was based on this work. After the war, he returned to London and to the BIS, becoming its president in 1947-50 and again in 1953.

In 1945, a UK periodical magazine “Wireless World” published his landmark technical paper "Extra-terrestrial Relays" in which he first set out the principles of satellite communication with satellites in geostationary orbits - a speculation realized 25 years later. During the evolution of his discovery, he worked with scientists and engineers in the USA in the development of spacecraft and launch systems, and addressed the United Nations during their deliberations on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.

Clarke's work, which led to the global satellite systems in use today, brought him numerous honors including the 1982 Marconi International Fellowship, a gold medal of the Franklin Institute, the Vikram Sarabhai Professorship of the Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, the Lindbergh Award and a Fellowship of King's College, London. Today, the geostationary orbit at 36,000 kilometers above the equator is named The Clarke Orbit by the International Astronomical Union.

After leaving the RAF in 1946, he resumed his formal studies and was awarded a Fellowship at King's College, London where he obtained first class honors in Physics and Mathematics in 1948.

In 1954, Clarke wrote to Dr. Harry Wexler, then chief of the Scientific Services Division, U.S. Weather Bureau, about satellite applications for weather forecasting. From these communications, a new branch of meteorology was born, and Dr. Wexler became the driving force in using rockets and satellites for meteorological research and operations.

At the same time, Clarke has been the author of many books, articles and papers. The first story he sold professionally was "Rescue Party", written in March 1945 and appearing in Astounding Science in May 1946. He went on to become a prolific writer of science fiction, renowned worldwide and with more than 70 titles to his name. Among his many non-fiction works, “Profiles of the Future” (1962) looked at the probable shape of tomorrow's world and stated his “Three Laws”.

In 1964, he started to work with the noted film producer Stanley Kubrick on a science fiction movie script. Four years later, he shared an Oscar nomination with Kubrick at the Hollywood Academy Awards for the film version of “2001: A Space Odyssey”. Then, in 1985, he published a sequel, “2010: Odyssey Two” and worked with Peter Hyams on the movie version. Their work was done using a Kaypro computer and a modem, linking Arthur in Sri Lanka and Peter Hyams in Los Angeles, leading to a book “The Odyssey File - The Making of 2010.”

In television, Clarke worked alongside Walter Cronkite and Wally Schirra for the CBS coverage of the Apollo 12 and 15 space missions. His thirteen-part TV series Arthur C. Clarke's Mysterious World in 1981 and Arthur C. Clarke's World of strange Powers in 1984 has been screened in many countries and he has contributed to other TV series about space, such as Walter Cronkite's Universe series in 1981.

Clarke first visited Colombo, Sri Lanka (then called Ceylon) in December 1954 and has lived there since 1956 pursuing an enthusiasm for underwater exploration along that coast and on the Great Barrier Reef. In recent years, he has been largely confined to a wheelchair due to post-polio syndrome, but his output as a writer has continued undiminished.

NOTE: the authorized biography by Neil McAleer - Arthur C. Clarke - The Authorized Biography - was published by Contemporary Books, Chicago, in 1992.

PS: In December 2007, the occasion of his 90th birthday, Clarke recorded a video message to his friends and fans, bidding them good-bye.

Clarke died in Sri Lanka at 1:30am on March 19, 2008 local time (UTC+5:30), after suffering from breathing problems, according to Rohan de Silva, one of his aides .

- Sri Lanka Guardian